[SVC Comment: We strongly support this legislation filed by Florida State Senators Gruters and Albritton. Please support their efforts and get the word out.
These courageous Senators are already being trashed by the same garbage “news” outlets that promote, unquestioningly, the rushed, dangerous COVID mRNA gene therapies (called “vaccines” by their promoters), which even according to FDA, are “Unapproved, Emergency Use Only.”
See, for example:
Florida GOP Chair Joe Gruters and Rep. Sabatini will speak at an anti-vax rally this month
READ ABOUT SB 364, HERE:
SB 364: Discrimination on the Basis of Personal Health Information
GENERAL BILL by Gruters ; (CO-INTRODUCERS) Albritton
Discrimination on the Basis of Personal Health Information; Prohibiting business and governmental entities that require individuals to present driver licenses and identification cards for specified purposes from taking certain actions on the basis of individuals’ vaccination status and proof of immunity from any virus; prohibiting public accommodations from discriminating against individuals on the basis of vaccination or immunity status, etc.
Read the full Bill here: https://m.flsenate.gov/session/bill/2021/364/billtext/filed/pdf
[SVC Comment: We thank Stand for Health Freedom for getting the word out about this important legislation and creating this easy to use template to contact your Florida legislator.
The pre-written text provided at the link below (by Stand for Health Freedom) can be improved.
We offer the following text as a stronger alternative. You may copy and paste the following text, or modify as you wish.]
FLORIDA: Click to Support SB364 Which Protects Individuals from Discrimination Based on Their Vaccine Status
SB364 is critical legislation for all Floridians because of the imminent push for vaccination and immunization cards to live and travel. SB364 will ensure that human and civil rights are protected and will prevent further economic hardship on families and community.
I object to being forced to have my body pierced by a hazardous mixture of substances, proven harmful not only in the lab but also in actual rollout. The CV19 shot is not really a “vaccine”, per se, in that it is the first mRNA shot that alters personal genetics, and as such is a genetic therapy.
Requirement as a condition for employment, travel, or being an active participant in my community is unlawful, unconstitutional, and personally injurious, yet without liability for the shot’s makers. No pharmaceutical product or known harmful medical procedure can ever be forced on the population, especially not a fast-tracked, injection free from liability for any harm it might cause — be it an adverse reaction, life-long injury, or death.
Most are unaware that under the PREP Act of 2005, the makers of the COVID vaccines will have near blanket immunity from liability. If I am, or if a family member is, injured or killed, no one will bear responsibility — not the vaccine manufacturer, the administering doctor, the government, or the employer who chose to mandate it. We alone will be left with the disastrous consequences and medical bills. Except that some of us might actually sue under procedural rules those public officials who endorse or fail to act to stop this rollout.
We are already experiencing widespread injuries, illnesses, impairments and deaths with the COVID injections. This is not mere “concern” or “risk”, since some of the ingredients themselves are known hazards with Material Safety Data Sheets! First-generation pharmaceutical products are notorious for adverse effects – some of them known in advance and therefore intentional – such as birth defects, as seen with the thalidomide disaster, or antibody dependent enhancement, as seen with the dengue vaccine.
Dr. Fauci spoke of “vaccine enhancement,” where post-vaccination subjects become significantly ill or die when exposed to the natural virus. Additionally, the mRNA technology used in several of the COVID vaccines is clinically unproven and has never been approved for commercial use. Dr. Fauci also stated that there is limited research and understanding about mRNA vaccines, including what their long-term effects might be and how they could alter DNA. He said this in CYA self-indemnification; however some attorneys intend to sue him, nevertheless.
Under current U.S. Supreme Court law, to mandate a medical intervention, there must be an epidemic that imperils the entire population. According to the CDC’s data, COVID survival rates for those under 70 is 99.5% or higher, which does not warrant mandating this vaccine. Furthermore, this vaccine has not shown to prevent transmission and seems to make people more likely to suffer viral infections. According to many medical doctors, curative and preventative measures for coronavirus are readily available and very effective. Likewise, treatments that have been successfully administered by healthcare clinicians globally.
Again, there is no substantive value upon which to mandate vaccines. When our nation’s top vaccine proponents sound alarms about the negative consequences of a rushed vaccine and are cautioning against many known problems with safety and efficacy, we must inform the public of the danger and withdraw the drug!
Where there is harm there is choice that must be established by law, and removal of the drug from rollout. I urge you to ensure that Florida public policy honors the safety and security of each citizen.
Please support this SB 364 by cosponsoring and voting yes. Thank you in advance.