Scapegoating Anti-Vaxxers for the Mumps Outbreaks: How Predictable

Original here: http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/12/scapegoating-anti-vaxxers-for-the-mumps-outbreaks-how-predictable/

by Marco Cáceres

Excerpt: 

So, how do we gauge how effective the MMR vaccine is and whether that effectiveness is fading, or even what is its level of effectiveness? That should be basic MMR vaccine science. As it turns out… not so much. According to Dr. Routh, “We don’t know the level of antibody required to stop a case of mumps in a person, so that question of knowing if the vaccine works less well over time is something we’re still working to investigate.”4

“Oddly enough most mumps patients said they had received their two recommended doses of the combined measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, according to the CDC.” — Dina Fine Maron, Scientific American
“Oddly enough most mumps patients said they had received their two recommended doses of the combined measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, according to the CDC.” — Dina Fine Maron, Scientific American

Of course, it doesn’t help matters much when you have a False Claims Act complaint filed against the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine, Merck, by the company’s own scientists for falsifying mumps vaccine test data. Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski have accused Merck of having “used improper testing techniques and falsified test data to fabricate a vaccine efficacy of 95 percent or higher.”5

Krahling and Wlochowski have said that they “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings,” and that “they were pressured by their Merck superiors and senior Merck management to participate in the fraud and subsequent cover-up.”5

Apparently, there is a lot we do not know about mumps and the vaccine that is supposed to prevent the disease. We know that mumps are cyclical. But we don’t know how effective the MMR vaccine is. Even more astounding than that, we don’t even know how to gauge the level of effectiveness of the vaccine. The fraud case against Merck just makes everything even more sketchy.

Yet, in the absence of all this scientific information, some people apparently have no problem trying to scapegoat an entire segment of the population engaging in independent thinking and choosing to exercise informed consent rights with regard to vaccination.

Read the entire article here:  http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/12/scapegoating-anti-vaxxers-for-the-mumps-outbreaks-how-predictable/

 

Advertisements

CDC’s Rasmussen Paper on Zika and Microcephaly: Poor Case for ‘Smoking Gun’

Original here: http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/12/cdcs-rasmussen-paper-on-zika-and-microcephaly-poor-case-for-smoking-gun/

by Marco Cáceres

What Drs. Rasmussen, Jamieson, Honein, and Petersen did was take the available “evidence” about a possible link between Zika and microcephaly and plugged it into a formula, Shepard’s criteria, to see how it held up to Dr. Shepard’s test of what, in his view, should qualify as sufficient proof of causality of a birth defect.

Excerpt: 

The question that has to be asked is whether, on balance, meeting a set of criteria developed by a pediatrician two decades ago constitutes even a remotely adequate basis on which to conclude causality of microcephaly by Zika when it is already well-known that that birth defect can be caused by any number of environmental factors, including exposure to chemicals, severe malnutrition, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and drug abuse?

And why suddenly, almost overnight, has a virus that has traditionally been known to be relatively harmless become so virulent?

Does plugging in some very preliminary data on Zika and microcephaly into a set of criteria seem a credible alternative to conducting in depth prospective studies on thousands of pregnant women exposed to Zika over a period of time? This doesn’t have the feel of authentic scientific methodology. It’s more as if someone knew the conclusion they wanted to reach and then went out and found the methodology that allowed them to get there as swiftly and neatly as possible. Why the hurry?

Nurse Warns of “Biologics” & Forced Flu Shots Happening in US Hospitals

h/t Jefferey Jaxen: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCJAIN0vEyHXecOKQz2ySdQ

Published on May 13, 2016

Listen to a whistleblower nurse as she describes her experience inside a hospital taking orders to unknowingly force vaccinate patients with the flu shot. Later she describes how The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) has redefined the term “Biologics” being used in hospital consent forms to include vaccines.

THIS LIVESTREAM VIDEO IS COMPLIMENTS OF THE DEDICATED TEAM AT FACTSONVAX.COM. PLEASE VISIT THEIR SITE TO FIND OUT MORE