Class and Race Profiling in the Vaccine Culture War

Original here:  http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/July-2017/class-and-race-profiling-in-vaccine-culture-war.aspx

By Barbara Loe Fisher

To activate and view hyperlinked references, please click here once and then click any superscripted number below to access a hyperlinked reference, or scroll down to the bottom of the article to view all hyperlinked references.

The Vaccine Culture War is heating up. 1 Ground zero is America, Europe and other economically developed countries, where the pharmaceutical industrial complex is raising an iron fist to protect multi-billion dollar profits by disempowering the people. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

criminal

In America, professors and doctors in academia and government are profiling parents by class and race to shame and discredit those challenging vaccine orthodoxy. Elite members of the highest paid professions in our society are using academic journals and mainstream media to openly preach fear, hate, prejudice and discrimination against people who disagree with them about vaccination.

Law Professor: Mothers of Unvaccinated Children Are Criminals

“When it comes to vaccines, rich parents get away with child neglect,” the headline in the Washington Post proclaimed on May 10, 2017. The OpEd was written by a Pace University law professor promoting criminal prosecution of mothers whose children are not vaccinated. 9 She alleged that state legislatures are accommodating “wealthy” mothers by allowing exemptions in vaccine laws, while poor pregnant women have “faced charges of criminal child abuse” and imprisonment for “failing to deliver adequate nutrition or delivering drugs via their breast milk.” She suggested that all mothers who don’t vaccinate their children are criminals and should be punished – “regardless of socioeconomic status” – because vaccination is a “collective obligation” and “the science on the efficacy and safety of vaccines is clear.”

Boston Herald: Hang People Talking Bad About Vaccines

That “punish the mothers” Op Ed was preceded by a May 8 Boston Herald editorial revealing just how far the persecution of people advocating for vaccine safety and informed consent has gone. The Boston Heraldeditorial staff called for the execution of individuals who exercise free speech about vaccine risks and failures. As in, it should be “a hanging offense” to inform parents (especially to inform parents in “immigrant communities”) that vaccines carry an unpredictable risk of injury or death and often fail to work as advertised. 10

hanging src=

Nobody should be surprised. Prejudice and discrimination against groups of people, whether because of the color of their skin, their gender, how they dress, what they eat, where they live, their religious beliefs, their cultural values and political opinions – or simply because they choose to stay healthy in a different way – is always a slippery slope once it is allowed to gain a foothold in society.

M.D. Professor Vaccine Developer Calls for “Funeral” of Vaccine Safety and Choice Advocacy

In 2011, Greg Poland, a University of Minnesota professor of medicine and vaccine developer at Mayo Clinic, 11 12 profiled parents concerned about vaccine risks in the New England Journal of Medicine. He said, “Antivaccinationists tend toward complete distrust of government and manufacturers, conspiratorial thinking, denialism, low cognitive complexity in thinking patterns, reasoning flaws, and a habit of substituting anecdotes for data.” Then he used a death image to invoke a thinly veiled threat. He asked, “What can we do to hasten the funeral of antivaccination campaigns?” 13

CDC on Mothers: Who Are They and Where Do They Live?

Trash talk has become the weapon of choice for a select group of professors and doctors using academic journals and mainstream media to humiliate and bully people who disagree with them about the science, policy, law and ethics of vaccination. In the 21st century, it has been going on in earnest since about 2004 when Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials kicked off the Vaccine Culture War by asking this question in the Journal of Pediatrics: “Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live?” 14

mother and child

The CDC study authors played with the words “undervaccinated” and “unvaccinated” so mothers could be profiled by class and race. They said:

“Undervaccinated children tend to be black, to have a younger mother who was not married and did not have a college degree, to live in a household near the poverty level, and to live in a central city. Unvaccinated children tended to be white, to have a mother who was married and had a college degree, to live in a household with an annual income exceeding $75,000 and to have parents who expressed concerns regarding the safety of vaccines and indicated that medical doctors have little influence over vaccination decisions for their children.”

There it was, the uncomfortable truth that it is college educated, financially stable middle class mothers independently evaluating the benefits and risks of vaccination rather than blindly trusting and relying on someone else to do their thinking for them. Although the CDC’s 2004 profiling study drew lines between mothers based on race and socio-economic class, there was no discussion of the distinct possibility that those lines would disappear if all mothers were financially stable, able to access full information about vaccination, and were truly free to make voluntary vaccine decisions without being punished for the decision they make.

Your skin doesn’t have to be a certain color and you don’t have to belong to a certain socio-economic class – or have a college degree – to figure out that you are not being told the whole truth about risks that doctors insist your child must take. All you have to do is vaccinate your healthy child and witness that child have symptoms of severe vaccine reactions and either die or become a totally different child physically, mentally and emotionally.

Continues here: http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/July-2017/class-and-race-profiling-in-vaccine-culture-war.aspx

TONIGHT: Vaccine Exemption Google Hangout — LIVE, at 9 pm EST

[Important note: Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC) has not received any specific information to suggest that local officials are making it difficult for — or “pushing back” against — parents who make the requests for exemption from vaccination.
(See: https://sarasotavaccinationchoice.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/help-request-from-parents-seeking-vaccination-exemptions-in-sarasota-county-or-florida-generally/)

That said, we are hearing from more local parents who are being “fired” by their family doctors or pediatricians for exercising their right to refuse one or more vaccinations for their children.

We find this practice, of doctors “firing” their patients, to be unconscionable.]

=========

The following is the text of an email from Patrick Gentempo, producer of ‘Vaccines Revealed’ documentary series.

Here’s a quick reminder that your Vaccine Exemption Guide Google Hangout is Tonight!

Don’t miss Dr. Patrick Gentempo and Dr. Beau Pierce answering the most important questions live on this Hangout!

In fact, if you have a question, you’d like us to cover, send us a quick email to: support@vaccinesrevealed.com

What do you do now?

Share this LIVE broadcast with everyone you can think of that might have questions about vaccines.

We’ll be covering your questions live!

And… We have a free Vaccine Exemption Guide for everyone who registers during the webcast but you’ve got to be present in order to claim yours!

See you Tonight!!

-The Vaccines Revealed Team

Remember, 9:00 PM EST. [Wednesday, 7/19/17]

Here is the link… Video feed will go live automatically at start of event.

What Did The CDC Know And When Did They Know It? [Vaccines & Autism]

See also, related to the infamous “Simpsonwood” meeting, held by CDC on June, 2000:

Summary:
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/quicksummary.html
A private emergency meeting was held in Simpsonwood, Georgia in 2000 with the CDC, health authorities, and vaccine manufacturers, where secret transcripts record participants saying “the number of dose related relationships [between mercury and autism] are linear and statistically significant” and that this information would need to be kept out of “less responsible hands”

The Truth Behind the Vaccine Cover-up by Russell Blaylock, M.D. (2004)
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/2.6.pdf

Chapter II: 1999-2000: Simpsonwood
http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/chapter2.html

Transcript of Simpsonwood meeting:
Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information June 7-8, 2000 Simpsonwood Retreat Center Norcross, Georgia
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Simpsonwood-Documents.pdf

============

What Did The CDC Know And When Did They Know It?
http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/07/what-did-the-cdc-know-and-when-did-they-know-it.html

By Dr. William H. Gaunt and Spencer M. Gaunt, RN

“O let me ne’er forget that though the wrong seems oft so strong, God is the ruler yet.” (From the hymn “This Is My Father’s World”)

Scientists and doctors at the CDC vaccine division knew in 2000 that mercury in vaccines was causing neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.  That year CDC scientist Thomas Verstraeten did a study of over 400,000 infants comparing children who got the most mercury from vaccines with children who got no mercury from vaccines.  The children who got the most mercury were more than 7 times as likely to become autistic compared to those who got no mercury.

The data from this study was shared at a conference but the study was never published.  A meeting(called the Simpsonwood Meeting) was called to address this “mercury in vaccines causes autism” problem.  CDC doctors and scientists were joined by vaccine experts from all over the country.  There was agreement to remove mercury from vaccines as soon as possible.  One of the doctors in attendance was notified that his first grandson had just been born.  He called his son and told him not to allow his grandson to get a vaccine containing mercury.

Mercury was subsequently removed from most pediatric vaccines within the next 3 years.  Unfortunately, the flu shot and the dtap shot have since been recommended for pregnant women.  Multi-dose flu shots still contain mercury and the dtap vaccine contains aluminum.  Mercury and aluminum are both powerful neurotoxins and when injected at the same time they work synergistically to multiply the risk of brain damage.

When a pregnant women is given these vaccines, it is equivalent to injecting the developing fetus with mercury and aluminum.  The ability of the body to detoxify heavy metals is nearly nonexistent in a fetus.  Do vaccines given during pregnancy cause an increase in fetal death and miscarriage?  Do the children born to women who got these vaccines during pregnancy have a higher rate of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism?

The answers are likely yes and yes but studies that would provide the answers are discouraged.  Studies funded by the CDC can’t be trusted.  Independent studies by scientists not paid by the CDC are needed to get honest answers to these important questions.  The CDC’s official position is: “several studies prove that vaccines do not cause autism”.  The studies the CDC refers to are heavily manipulated scientific fraud.  They even claim that no more studies should be done on the vaccines-autism connection because “the science is settled”.  The truth is that vaccines can and do cause autism and many other problems.  This denial by the CDC is preventing scientific studies that can identify which ingredients in which vaccines are the causal factors.In 2001, the CDC knew that children who got the MMR vaccine on time between 12 and 18 months of age were far more likely to become autistic compared to children who got the MMR after age 3.  This effect was most striking in black boys but was statistically significant in all races and both sexes.  The study did not include children who did not get the MMR.  The MMR vaccine does not contain mercury so the mechanism of action causing autism is different than in mercury containing vaccines.

Several studies now show that the measles virus portion of the MMR is infecting the gut and the brain.  The documentary film “Vaxxed” clearly shows the manipulation and deliberate disappearance of data in that study. The final publication in the journal Pediatrics in 2004 concluded that there was no increased risk of autism with earlier MMR vaccination.  CDC scientist whistleblower Dr. William Thompson is the central figure in “Vaxxed”.  He has revealed details about how the data was manipulated and disappeared so the final published study could have a conclusion that is the opposite of the truth.  More than 5,000 petitions in Vaccine Court for autism were dismissed based on this fraudulent study.

A vaccinated versus unvaccinated study was published on April 27, 2017 in The Journal of Translational Science.  The lead author was Dr. Anthony Mawson of Jackson State University.  It analyzed health data on 666 homeschooled children.  The unvaccinated children had a higher incidence of chicken pox, measles, and whooping cough as expected.  These diseases are rarely fatal.  They help the immune system mature while providing permanent protection from reinfection.   The vaccinated children had 4.2 times more autism, 4.2 times more ADHD, 5.2 times the incidence of learning disabilities, and 30.1 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to the unvaccinated children.  Many other health factors were analyzed and the unvaccinated children were far healthier across the board.

Continues here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/07/what-did-the-cdc-know-and-when-did-they-know-it.html

Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Parents and Pediatricians Need To Be Aware Of

Original here: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/07/02/critical-vaccine-studies.aspx

Story at-a-glance

  • Comparing vaccination rates in 34 developed nations revealed a significant correlation between infant mortality rates and the number of vaccine doses infants receive. The U.S. requires the most vaccines and has the highest infant mortality
  • Research shows the more vaccines an infant receives simultaneously, the greater their risk of being hospitalized or dying compared to those receiving fewer vaccines
  • The earlier in infancy a child is vaccinated, the greater their risk of being hospitalized or dying compared to children receiving the same vaccines at a later time

By Dr. Mercola

Vaccines: Are they safe? Are they effective? To help answer those questions is Neil Z. Miller,1 a medical research journalist and director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute.

Miller has investigated vaccines for three decades and written several books on the subject, including “Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?,” “Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners” and, most recently, “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers.”

“Miller’s Review,” published in 2016, is a magnificent piece of work. In it, he reviews the concern about vaccine safety and efficacy raised by 400 peer-reviewed published studies. The book doesn’t review studies that support vaccination (almost all of which are funded by the industry and the government, by the way) as those studies are available on the CDC website.

“I got started when my own children were born … over 30 years ago … When my wife was pregnant, I felt I had to do due diligence about vaccines. I have to be honest, though. Before I even started to research vaccines, my wife and I pretty much knew intuitively that we were not going to inject our children with vaccines.

When I give lectures, I often tell people, ‘How can you expect to achieve health by injecting healthy children with toxic substances?’ I intuitively knew that … but still felt an obligation to do my due diligence and to do the research,” Miller says.

“The thing is that when I do things, I do them pretty thoroughly … I was doing my research at medical libraries. I was gathering everything and I started to collate it and coordinate it … People started to find out about the information I had organized. They were asking me about vaccines even way back then. I organized it into a booklet. I started to share that with people. Everything snowballed from that first booklet.”

Don’t Believe the ‘There’s No Evidence’ Argument

“Miller’s Review” was created in response to the common refrain that “there are no studies showing vaccines are unsafe or ineffective.”

“I hear this often,” Miller says. “Parents come to me all the time, saying, ‘My doctor told me that vaccines are safe and there are no studies that prove [otherwise].’ I’ve been doing the research for 30 years. I know of literally thousands of studies that document [concerns]. My books all document [those] studies.”

“Miller’s Review” is unique in that it summarizes 400 studies in bullet points with direct quotes from the study — with one study per page — plus citations so that you can find and read the study in full should you decide to do so. All of the studies are published in peer-reviewed journals and indexed by the National Library of Medicine.

CONTINUES HERE:  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/07/02/critical-vaccine-studies.aspx