By Jefferey Jaxen
It’s official! The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and, by extension, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been put on legal notice. The notice requests confirmation that certain obligations regarding vaccine safety have been or will be fulfilled.
Why the HHS? Due the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the 1986 Act), the HHS shoulders virtually all responsibility for assuring the safety of vaccines being administered to America’s 78 million children. The 1986 Act allows Congress to step in if any act or duty ensuring vaccine safety is abandoned or failed. As it stands, such a burden falls upon the shoulders of the Acting Secretary of the HHS, Eric D. Hargan, and his agency.
After decades of its government passing the buck, avoiding reality, and ignoring the science, America has had enough. An awakening is hitting breakaway speeds as communities are rejecting coercive vaccination practices. Parents have leveraged and dominated social media platforms to sound the alarm about long-failed policies. Meanwhile, a submissive American medical community has forgotten its ethic of informed consent and lost sight of its original oath to do no harm.
The notice was served recently by a non-profit organization Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) founded by Del Bigtree. What is ICAN asking? There are 11 specific questions and points in the notice that previous HHS and CDC leadership should have addressed. But here we are, in 2017, having to serve our government oversight body a legal notice to ensure they do their stated duties.
ICAN’s questions and points are as follows:
Please explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?
Please list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life?
Please explain why HHS failed to cooperate with Harvard to automate VAERS reporting? And detail any steps that HHS has taken since toward automating VAERS reporting?
Please explain any specific steps taken by HHS to improve adverse reaction reporting to VAERS?
For each of the 38 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 1994 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?
For each of the 135 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 2011 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?
Please explain what HHS has done to assure that health care providers record the manufacturer and lot number for each vaccine they administer?
CONTINUES HERE: http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/checkmate-us-department-of-health-human-services-served-legal-notice-on-vaccine-safety-oversight-failure
#HHSNotice– Unveiling An Unprecedented Act
On October 12th, 2017, Del Bigtree and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), supported by 55 organizations representing over 5 million people, took an unprecedented step in the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. This is @HighWireTalk. This is the Informed Consent Action Network #HHSNotice #CivilAction