Professor Says Parents Have No Right to Refuse Vaccines for Their Children

[Our comment: No surprise here, unfortunately, regarding so-called Medical Ethicist and longtime pro-GMO (genetically modified organism) propagandist, Arthur Kaplan.]

Original here:

by Marco Cáceres

In a recent video commentary published in Medscape, New York University professor Arthur L. Caplan, PhD offered his views on the question of whether children have “vaccination rights.”1

Dr. Caplan thinks that what he defines as the “vaccination rights” of minor children supersede the legal right of their parents to exercise informed consent to vaccination on their children’s behalf if a parent elects to decline one or more government recommended vaccines for whatever reason. He claims that vaccinating children represents a higher moral imperative than respecting the informed consent rights of parents.

“I want to point out a moral stance that I don’t think has gotten enough attention, which is that every child has the right to be vaccinated,” said Caplan. “We keep talking about parents’ right to say yes or no, to avoid mandates or requirements, or to do what they choose to do. Someone has to speak up and say, ‘Well, what about the kids? Don’t they have any rights?’”1

Caplan believes that if parents refuse to vaccinate their kids the government has the right to override the legal right of parents to make medical care decisions for their children. Caplan argues that the government has the duty to vaccinate the children without the consent of the parents and by force, if need be. “If the parents won’t do it, I think it’s the responsibility of the state or the government to do it,” said Caplan. “The presumption should be not listening to what parents who don’t want to vaccinate are saying, but starting out with a presumption that kids have a right to fight off deadly diseases, that kids who can’t be vaccinated have a right to protection. How do we move public policy forward from there?”1

Attempts to answer Caplan’s question about how to “move public policy forward” on the issue of parental rights regarding vaccination of their children are already well underway in the United States. Legislation has been introduced in states like California that would seek to give government the right to make health care decisions for children, even against the wishes of their parents, if the state deems the decisions to be in the best interests of the children.2 3

Such legislation would also allow government authorities to take legal physical custody of children in cases where parents refuse to comply with mandates forcing or coercing them to vaccinate their children.2 3

Continues here:


Exclusive: Shoulder injuries caused by vaccine shots on the rise


Vaccine Debate Erupts After Mainstream Reporter is Injured by Flu Shot

Channel 4’s famous broadcaster goes public she was just injured by flu shot

About Those 80,000 Deaths from Influenza…

Exclusive: Shoulder injuries caused by vaccine shots on the rise

Original here:

Flu season is here and everyone is encouraging you to get your flu shot but when you do, make sure to pay close attention to how it’s being given.

News10NBC Investigative Reporter Jennifer Lewke has discovered a skyrocketing number of patients are reporting serious shoulder injuries caused by how their vaccination was administered.

Back in February, Rita Parks of Irondequoit went to her doctor’s office and had a routine vaccination.

“I was fine that day, no problems at all, it was the next morning I woke up and felt the pain,” she recalls.

As the days went on, she realized it wasn’t just general soreness, “sharp pains, very sharp pains all the time,” Parks says.

Nine months later, after multiple visits to her primary care doctor, a neurologist, an orthopedic specialist, and a chiropractor, Parks can still barely lift her arm.

“Shampooing my hair, as you can imagine, is really torture,” Parks says. “Drying it, in fact, my husband does a lot of that but worse of all, I have a two-year-old grandson and it just breaks my heart cause he’ll come over and he wants me to pick him up and I can’t so, I’ll just go please put him on my lap.”


Pork Gelatine use in NHS [Great Britain] vaccines ‘disappointing’ [Similar Used in USA]

h/t Health Freedom Action (

US Vaccines contain gelatin ingredients too.

Have you reviewed the various manufacturers package inserts to know what ingredients are in the US mandated vaccine schedule:


Original here:

Pork gelatine use in NHS vaccines ‘disappointing’

The nasal spray vaccine to [allegedly] protect children against flu contains porcine gelatine

The use of pork gelatine in three vaccines used by the NHS has been branded “disappointing” by the Vegetarian Society.

Chief executive Lynne Elliot added that the use of animal ingredients in medicines is “upsetting”.

Porcine gelatine is derived from pigs and used in vaccines against flu, shingles, measles, mumps and rubella.

Public Health England said the gelatine is used as a stabiliser and developing an alternative “may never happen”.

The government agency said the gelatine is “highly purified” and manufactured under “strict hygiene and safety regulations”.

A spokeswoman for Public Heath England said the gelatine helps to keep the vaccine viruses stable “to provide the best protection against flu”.

Ms Elliot said there should be “vegetarian and vegan versions of all medicines and vaccines”.


Examining the CDC’s Flu Death Statistics: Various Articles, Plus a Take Action Link

What’s Behind the CDC Claiming 80,000 Died From Flu Last Winter?

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 2017-2018 flu season was the deadliest flu season in the U.S. in four decades, hospitalizing 900,000 and killing 80,000, including 180 children. According to CNN,1 ” … [F]lu-related deaths have ranged from a low of about 12,000 during the 2011-2012 season to a high of about 56,000 during the 2012-2013.”

While that sounds ominous, it’s worth remembering that what they’re counting as “flu deaths” are not just deaths directly caused by the influenza virus, but also secondary infections such as pneumonia and other respiratory diseases, as well as sepsis.2

As you’d expect, these mortality statistics are now being used to frighten people into getting an annual flu shot. U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams goes even further, saying that getting vaccinated is a “social responsibility,” as it “protects others around you, including family, friends, co-workers and neighbors.”3

But is that actually true? Not according to recent research, it isn’t. In fact, research published earlier this year suggests repeated annual flu vaccinations could actually make you a greater health threat to your community. Influenza vaccination does not appear to lower the risk of disease transmission at all.


Flu Stats: When the Numbers Don’t Add Up

Flu Shots During Pregnancy: Insufficient Data to Inform Vaccine-Associated Risk

A universal flu vaccine: the mad science solution



[The following is the text of an email from]

US Take Action: CDC claims 80,000 flu deaths last year, but provides no proof

Where’s the data? Flu shot associated with autism

In a recent interview with the Associated Press Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield predictably said, “I’d like to see more people vaccinated,” but added that in last year’s season, “We lost 80,000 people to the flu.” But there is utterly no data or evidence to back up Redfield’s claim of that extraordinarily high number of deaths from flu. We would like to ask Dr. Redfield to please share the data that supports his claim.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics there is usually somewhere between 1,000 to 2,000 deaths from lab-verified flu annually in the US. Even though the number of flu shots given in the US increased 800% since the 1980s the number of verified deaths never seems to budge. The flu shot is notoriously ineffective, according to an meta-analysis by the Cochrane Collaboration typically 71 flu shots need to be administered to prevent one case of the flu.

Before you click on the Take Action link to send a message to Dr. Redfield, and his boss Secretary of Health and Human Service Alex Azar, asking him to provide the facts to back up his claim, please take a moment to consider the value of the news, information and advocacy provided to you by the Autism Action Network. If you want to keep that information coming please support our team in the Autism Community Walk and Resource Fair 2018 here:

There are significant associations between flu shots and autism. A recent study showed flu shots given to pregnant women in the first trimester of pregnancy are associated with a significant increase in autism in the child, but obstetricians still give flu shots to pregnant women in the first trimester. About 20% of flu shots in the US still contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. Internal CDC studies performed by Thomas Verstraeten in the late 90s showed 700% more autism in children given thimerosal-containing vaccines in infancy (google Simpsonwood), but pediatricians still give thimerosal-containing flu shots to infants. Thimerosal is banned in most of the developed democracies but not here. Any flu shot taken from a multi-dose vial, rather than a pre-filled syringe, contains thimerosal.

Please share this message with friends and family, and please share to social networks.