[GREENMEDINFO] Written by Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder
20 years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. The manufacturer Merck’s own product warning links MMR to a potentially fatal form of brain inflammation caused by measles. Why is this evidence not being reported?
The Vaccinated Spreading Measles
The phenomenon of measles infection spread by MMR (live measles-mumps-rubella vaccine) has been known for decades. In fact, 20 years ago, scientists working at the CDC’s National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it.
Measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period.
In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after the children were vaccinated.
Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.
The authors of this study used a relatively new technology at that time, namely, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which they believed could help resolve growing challenges associated with measles detection in the shifting post-mass immunization epidemiological and clinical landscape. These challenges include:
A changing clinical presentation towards ‘milder’ or asymptomatic measles in previously vaccinated individuals.
A changing epidemiological distribution of measles (a shift toward children younger than 15 months, teenagers, and young adults)
Increasing difficulty distinguishing measles-like symptoms (exanthema) caused by a range of other pathogens from those caused by measles virus.
An increase in sporadic measles outbreaks in previously vaccinated individuals.
Twenty years later, PCR testing is widely acknowledged as highly sensitive and specific, and the only efficient way to distinguish vaccine-strain and wild-type measles infection, as their clinical presentation are indistinguishable.
[SVC agrees with Brett Wilcox, who commented regarding this video from Forrest Maready,
“Forrest Maready: ‘Humane, compassionate people have killed far more humans with their good intentions than any truly malevolent dictator ever has.’
You’re a gift to what’s left of the free world, Forrest. May you long continue to be so.“]
The Needle or the Noose? — ‘My Incredible Opinion,’ Episode 88 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKKU0ZoLCv0
Published on May 16, 2017
The Boston Herald thinks anyone who dares to question the absolute safety and effectiveness of vaccines should be killed. Why is this a predictable response to anyone who questions State Science?
For more of Forrest Maready’s thoughtful commentary, see:
[Comment: Those of us who demand sanity, safety, and genuine informed consent with regard to the vaccination schedule, are increasingly being vilified and threatened. The latest example comes from the Boston Herald, which, in a dumbed down, poorly written editorial on May 8th stated that asking questions about the brain-damaging ingredients in vaccines “ought to be a hanging offense.”
Shame on the Boston Herald! Shamelessly taking major ad revenue from Big Pharma while simultaneously acting as its threatening “hit man!” The only good thing about this article is all the comments it inspired, which shows how people really feel about the issue.
If you strongly believe in health freedom and informed consent, please contact the Boston Herald — see below for contact information — and demand that they issue a retraction of their support for violence against those who question the vaccine orthodoxy. ~ SVC]
If you have ever wondered what the opposite of love is, let me tell you… it’s not hate. It’s fear.12Yes, I’m aware of the slightly different and perhaps more popular take on that idea by Elie Wiesel: “The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.”3 I like both of them, but I lean toward the former. So what breeds fear?
What we have in the evolving, ever more contentious debate over vaccines and vaccine policy in the United States is a lot of fear, fueled by a lot of ignorance. Ignorance about vaccine history, science and the ethics of mandatory vaccination laws. That’s bad enough. But what’s worse is the product of that ignorance-bred fear.
All too often, the by-product of fear is violence or the call to violence—which is what we’re starting to see in newspaper and magazine articles written by those who oppose and want to marginalize anyone who publicly criticizes the safety of vaccine policies or advocates for the human right to exercise informed consent to medical risk taking, which includes the right to make a voluntary decision about use of vaccines.
The piece was in response to a recent event in which Somali American families, who have the highest rate of autism in the United States, voiced their concerns about the vaccine injury they were experiencing. The Minnesota Somali community is being aggressively targeted for rounds of MMR vaccines.
Why I am filing a complaint with the FBI and the Boston Police
In conclusion, with its editorial calling for the killing of vaccine skeptics, the Boston Herald has just declared open warfare on people like myself who are informed, compassionate defenders of the lives of children. The Boston Herald has directly threatened rational vaccine skeptics and is now complicit in any acts of aggression or violence against any of us. Today, I am filing an official criminal complaint with the Boston FBI to urge them to investigate the Boston Herald staffers for their criminal intimidation and calls for mass murder, and I am going to inform the FBI that I consistently assert my right to invoke a firearm in my own self-defense against violent lunatics like the Boston Herald terrorists.
As part of this effort, I have already called the Boston police, and they told me where to officially file my complaint in my local jurisdiction so that they can open an investigation into the Boston Herald.