Two Calls to Action: U.S. Mandatory Vaccine Legislation … ‘Boston Herald’ Protest

ACTION 1 ===============

FORCED vaccines: New bill H.R. 1313 could demand you get a vaccination or lose your job
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccination-legislation-2239.html

EXCERPT: 

(NaturalHealth365) Republican congresswoman Virginia Foxx has introduced new legislation with an intention of forcing employers to require all workers to submit to a mandatory vaccination program or risk losing their job. House Resolution bill H.R. 1313 is called the “Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act,” and its aim is to require employees to receive genetic screenings and mandatory vaccines – whether they like it or not.

The stated reason of forced or mandatory vaccines is “wellness” and disease prevention in the workplace. If workers refuse the vaccination, they could be subject to being refused employment, losing their jobs (for existing employees), higher health insurance premiums, being ostracized within the workplace and other penalties.

Legislation opens door to mandatory vaccines without alternatives

Instead of clarifying specific vaccines or treatments to be made mandatory, the legislation has open-ended language that paves the way for employers to be able to force workers to accept whatever they deem “important to wellness” in the workplace. Those in opposition to the legislation cite fears about mandatory vaccines imposed by the government or its agencies.

The National Vaccine Information Center is urging concerned citizens to contact their own representatives and senators to express their views about H.R. 1313. When doing so, please remember to express your opinions intelligently and respectfully – you are far more likely to be heard if you are firm but polite when explaining your point of view.

Visit this NVIC link for guidance on how to contact your state’s representatives.

END EXCERPT

ACTION 2 ===============

NOTE: The following text is courtesy of the Autism Action Network (http://autismactionnetwork.org)

Boston Herald Editor calls for execution of vaccine critics

In what may be a first for a major corporate media outlet in the US, Boston Herald Editorial Page Editor Rachelle G. Cohen in a column published last week called for the mass execution of critics of vaccine policy. 

“These are the facts: Vaccines don’t cause autism. Measles can kill. And lying to vulnerable people about the health and safety of their children ought to be a hanging offense.”

Yes, you read that right, she wants people who disagree with current vaccine policy to be killed. One can imagine the outcry if a major American newspaper had called for killing of an entire group of people for having opinions that question government policy. But if the target is us, silence.

First the vaccine industry demands, and gets, no accountability for their actions. Then they demand complete control over what is injected into our children’s bodies. Then, as in California, they demand no education for children whose parents refuse to comply. Paul Offit, the vaccine industry’s preferred spokesperson, has been calling for the states to seize the children of parents who do not obey their directives, and now we are at the point where a major corporate media outlet feels comfortable calling for people like us to be killed. This isn’t trivial. This isn’t an accident,. This is just the first of what will be a growing chorus if we ignore this attack.

Please click on the Take Action link to send a message to Cohen and her boss Editor-in-Chief Joe Sciacca. For the first time ever the message area will be blank. You will simply have to fill in your own message for this person who wants to see you dead.

And please call the Boston Herald and ask to speak to Editor-in-Chief Joe Sciacca

(617)  426-3000

You can read the column here:

http://www.bostonherald.com/opinion/editorials/2017/05/editorial_preying_on_parents_fear

A demonstration to counter Ms. Cohen’s call for our extermination will be held:

Thursday, May 18,  11 am
70 Fargo St, Boston, MA 02110

More info here:

https://www.facebook.com/events/1941790046105098/

Please attend. Please bring a large picture of a loved one who may have been injured or killed by a vaccine. And signs.

Please share this message with friends and family, and please post to social networks.

END

———–

SEE ALSO:
Boston “Hang The Anti-Vaxxers” Protest Rally, May 18, 2017
http://www.activistpost.com/2017/05/boston-hang-anti-vaxxers-protest-rally-may-18-2017.html

Help Request from Parents Seeking Vaccination Exemptions in Sarasota County — or Florida Generally?

Dear Reader,

We continue to receive inquiries from local parents asking us if they should expect to encounter hurdles or difficulties in obtaining, for their school-age children, religious or medical exemptions from vaccination requirements in Sarasota County. [1] 

For example, a local mother we’ll refer to as “Sarah” (not her real name) wrote the following:

I am planning on filing the ‘DH 681’ religious exemption for my daughter… I’d like to obtain the religious exemption for her, but I don’t want to go in blind, have them start asking me all these questions, then blindside me and then they just reject it.

I can go to the Department of Health, I’m assuming up here on Ringling Boulevard [in downtown Sarasota] and get it done there? [2] 

What is the process? What should I expect when I walk in the door?

What kind of questions are they allowed to ask me? Can they ask me if she was vaccinated before? If they do, do I say yes, or do I say no?

Are they allowed to ask me what religion I am? Or why I’m just now deciding to do this when she was vaccinated before? Do I tell them that I switched religions?

I just need to go in armed with the knowledge of what to expect and how it should go.

… In summary, has anyone in our community obtained the religious exemption? If so did it work? Were you denied?Was it easy?

Any help is much appreciated please and thank you.”

Important note: Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC) has not received any specific information to suggest that local officials are making it difficult for — or “pushing back” against — parents who make the requests for exemption from vaccination.

That said, however, we would greatly appreciate any feedback from Sarasota parents, regarding your personal experiences —positive or negative — in dealing with the exemption process.

Also, any suggestions you have found helpful in navigating this process would be most appreciated.

To share your story or suggestions, please email svcsrqorg@gmail.com or post to our Facebook page, HERE.

Note: If you send your feedback via email, we promise to maintain your anonymity; needless to say, if you post via Facebook, we may have no control over whether your name appears or not.

Thank you,
Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC)

DISCLAIMER: This is not, nor should it be construed as, legal or medical advice.

======

NOTES:

[1] According to Florida Statutes, two types of exemptions from vaccinations are available; religious and medical.

National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has summarized the Florida situation as follows:

Quick Facts and Resources for Florida Residents
“A request for a religious exemption from immunization requirements must be presented to the facility/school on the Department of Health’s Religious Exemption From Immunization form (DH 681 Form). The DH 681 Form is issued only by county health departments and only for a child who is not immunized because of his/her family’s religious tenets or practices. If a parent requests such an exemption, the county health department staff must use the current DH 681 Form, which has been signed by the parent affirming the written statement on the form that a religious conflict exists. This form must be issued upon request. No other information should be solicited from the parent or guardian.”  Rule 64D-3.046, Florida Administrative Code. Medical exemptions are also allowed. [EMPHASES ADDED]
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/florida.aspx

Exemption from Required Immunizations: Florida Dept. of Health
http://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/immunization/children-and-adolescents/immunization-exemptions/

[2] Florida Dept. of Health: Sarasota Locations
http://sarasota.floridahealth.gov/locations/index.html

The Right of INFORMED CONSENT – The Sources of the Law…

SEE ALSO:

Informed Consent
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Memorial/Informed-Consent.aspx

The Moral Right to Conscientious, Philosophical and Personal Belief Exemption to Vaccination
http://www.nvic.org/informed-consent.aspx
by Barbara Loe Fisher, Co-Founder & President, NVIC


The Right of INFORMED CONSENT – The Sources of the Law…
INFORMED CONSENT is Fundamenal…
By Ralph Fucetola JD – President, Institute for Health Freedom

Original here: http://bolenreport.com/right-informed-consent-sources-law/#more-7818

This Law Note responds to the erroneous idea that the international humanitarian right of Informed Consent only applies in cases of war.

Supreme Court of United states columns row in Washington DC

In Supreme Court Decision Missouri vs McNeely the court said:

“…this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests.”

When people cite the Geneva Conventions [1] as a source of the right they are sometimes told that the Conventions only apply in time of war. We assert that the Conventions recognize a right of Informed Consent (by operation of the Nuremberg Code) but are clearly not the only source of legal support for the humanitarian right of Informed Consent.

There are many international agreements that were made in Geneva, the original home of the League of Nations and now the European base for the United Nations. Among those agreements are the Geneva Conventions proper, which relate to armed conflict. Among other matters, they cover the handling of criminal charges against prisoners of war. In that context, at the end of WWII, the Nuremberg Code was proclaimed.

The Nuremberg Code requires respect for Informed Consent, without “the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion…”

The Nuremberg Code was drafted by American legal scholars as a “restatement” of the then-existing international law of Informed Consent. It restated the law not just in the case of war, but as applied to all persons at all times. It was used as a statement of the law during the Subsequent Nuremberg Trial of the Nazi doctors.

The Nuremberg Code is binding on the USA since it was drafted for US military trials of defeated foreigners and the Geneva Conventions say that if a power puts prisoners on trial it must apply the same law to them as to its own people, thus the Nuremberg Code must also encode the law of Informed Consent as applied to Americans and the other allies that joined in the doctors trial.

But that was over a half century ago and international humanitarian law has continued to develop.

For example, Australia’s fundamental law recognizes the right of Informed Consent, as does the fundamental law of many nations. In the USA there is a federal statute applying Informed Consent to medical experiments and IRBs (Institutional Review Boards).

Significantly, there is also the UN Declaration on BioEthics, negotiated in Geneva, using language similar to the Nuremberg Code and clearly applies to both treatment and experiment:

Article 6 – “Consent – 1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. 2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.”

Article 28 – “Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any claim to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity…”[2]

The Common Law has recognized the right to Informed Consent for at least a century.

“Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages.” [3]

And nearly a hundred years later, the US Supreme Court reiterated the legal principle: even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” [4]

The right of Informed Consent is recognized in time of war and in time of peace; for medical treatment (including the alleged preventative intervention of vaccination) and for medical experiment; for adults and children; for all humans everywhere and at all times.

Be aware: unless you assert your right to Informed Consent it will be ignored by the medical authorities.

By Ralph Fucetola JD – President, Institute for Health Freedom

www.InHeRe.org

Advance Vaccine Directive http://tinyurl.com/AVDcard

[1] https://www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law/treaties-customary-law/geneva-conventions

[2] http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

[3] Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914)

[4] Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US _ (2013) – http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/11-1425.html

CDC document bombshell reveals list of all vaccine excipients, including “African Green Monkey Kidney Cells” and fibroblast cells from aborted human fetuses … see the complete list

[The bizarre and often extremely toxic ingredients that go into vaccines are no secret for anyone who cares to know. Demand to read the package inserts for each and every vaccine. Many of the inserts are listed here: https://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts-human/ or search the FDA website.]

Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary
Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

Natural News article here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-06-cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of-all-vaccine-excipients-including-african-green-monkey-kidney-cells-and-fibroblast-cells-from-aborted-human-fetuses-see-the-complete-list.html

(NATURAL NEWS) Almost no one has any real idea what’s found in vaccines. When they allow themselves to be injected with vaccines, they’re oblivious to the fact that they are being injected with aborted human fetus cell lines or African Green Monkey kidney pus cells harvested from infected, disease primates. (See proof from the CDC, below.)

Yet, astonishingly, the CDC openly admits to all this (and more). In a PDF posted on the CDC website entitled “Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary,” the CDC lists all the excipients currently used in vaccines being injected into adults and children across the United States. The CDC’s list, current as of January 6, 2017, was “extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts,” according to the CDC.

The complete list is found in this CDC document (PDF). In case the CDC removes it — because they’ve been known to suddenly “memory hole” documents they don’t want the public to see — we’ve also posted a copy at the Natural News servers (PDF).

The WI-38 cell line is widely known to be “derived from lung tissue of an aborted white (caucasian) female fetus,” as even the pro-vaccine Wikipedia website admits. As the Coriell Institute for Medical Research explains about the MRC-5 cell line / WI-38:

The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. The cell morphology is fibroblast-like. The karyotype is 46,XY; normal diploid male. Cumulative population doublings to senescence is 42-48. G6PD isoenzyme is type B.

The human fetal tissue cells have become such an issue of outrage that even the Vatican has issued a statement concerning their use, in which they address, “vaccines containing live viruses which have been prepared from human cell lines of fetal origin, using tissues from aborted human fetuses as a source of such cells.” You can find the Vatican’s response at this link, in which they discuss the moral and ethical issues of “The principle of licit cooperation in evil.”

Below, you’ll find the complete list published by the CDC, de-duplicated and sorted alphabetically. Notice that these ingredients include toxic metals (aluminum salts), bizarre animal cells from humans, monkeys, cows, pigs and chickens, ingredients derived from GMOs, the radioactive element barium, artificial coloring chemicals, excitotoxins such as glutamate, chemical cleansing agents (Triton X-100), dangerous bacterial strains (E.coli), toxic chemicals such as glutaraldehyde, thimerosal (mercury) and much more.

No one can refute any of this because it’s admitted by the CDC itself.

More analysis of the toxicity of these ingredients will be published at Vaccines.news and Natural News.

ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-06-cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of-all-vaccine-excipients-including-african-green-monkey-kidney-cells-and-fibroblast-cells-from-aborted-human-fetuses-see-the-complete-list.html