Pro Vax Manifesto

Original here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/05/pro-vax-manifesto.html


Pro Vax Manifesto

Barnum

“I have never fully understood how stupid and absurd the vaccine industry’s arguments defending the current vaccine program actually were until Brett Wilcox put them all together on one page.  I can’t believe how badly this country is being scammed.  It is not just horrifically criminal that they are getting away with this, it is monumentally embarrassing that anyone in the US believes them.  What suckers we have been.” – Ginger Taylor

Reprinted from Running The Country

by Brett Wilcox

I’ve been studying vaccines for a few years now. During that time several pro-vaxxers have done their best to convince me of the error of my ways. Many grow frustrated with me and inform me that I’m simple minded and stupid. It’s true that I wasn’t the quickest kid in the class. It’s taken me a long time to grasp what they’re saying, but I think I’ve finally got it. If you’re a pro-vaxxer, please let me know if I accurately represented your position. Thanks for your patience!

Offit Get the F our of here full

Pro Vax Manifesto

* All disease is bad.
* All vaccines are good.
* The science is settled, all vaccines work.
* All vaccines are equally effective.
* All vaccines are equally safe.

* Vaccines are tested for safety more than any other pharmaceutical product.
* Vaccine safety studies are long term studies, meaning they last for more than four days.
* Experimental vaccines intended for babies are first tested on babies.
* Experimental vaccines that will eventually be given to unhealthy children are first tested on unhealthy children.
* Vaccine safety studies always include inert placebos.
* The entire vaccine schedule has been studied for safety.

* The theory and the practice of vaccination are identical.
* Vaccine Information Sheets contain the same information as Vaccine Package Inserts.
* Vaccination equals immunization, yet the public should still fear and ostracize the unvaccinated.
* Vaccines work, but only if everyone else is vaccinated because, of course, my medicine makes your medicine more effective.
* Everyone should be forced to vaccinate to protect the vaccinated from getting the diseases for which they were vaccinated.

* Vaccines have never caused ADHD, tics, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, learning disabilities, cancer, diabetes, eczema, paralysis, autism, or any other injury.
* It’s just a coincidence when babies get sick, diseased, regress, or die following vaccination.
* Vaccination is the leading cause of coincidences.

* There is nothing in vaccines that could hurt a baby or anyone else. That’s why vaccine manufacturers and doctors can’t be sued for vaccine injury or death.
* If vaccines injure a baby, it’s the baby’s fault for having bad genes. Vaccines just identify the defect.
* Vaccines are composed of neurotoxins, human fetal DNA, animal tissue, adjuvants, allergens, antigens, and contaminants. Buildings are evacuated and hazmat teams are called when the contents of a vaccine spill on the floor. That’s why the same ingredients are safe when repeatedly injected into pregnant women, infants, toddlers, teens, the aged, and virtually everyone in between.
* The toxic ingredients in vaccines make sick people healthy and healthy people healthier.

Continues here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/05/pro-vax-manifesto.html

Questioning Vaccines is a ‘Hanging Offense’ Says the ‘Boston Herald’ — TAKE ACTION

[Comment: Those of us who demand sanity, safety, and genuine informed consent with regard to the vaccination schedule, are increasingly being vilified and threatened. The latest example comes from the Boston Herald, which, in a dumbed down, poorly written editorial on May 8th stated that asking questions about the brain-damaging ingredients in vaccines “ought to be a hanging offense.”

Shame on the Boston Herald! Shamelessly taking major ad revenue from Big Pharma while simultaneously acting as its threatening “hit man!”  The only good thing about this article is all the comments it inspired, which shows how people really feel about the issue.

If the State can tag, track down and force individuals to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.” — Barbara Loe Fisher, National Vaccine Information Center

If you strongly believe in health freedom and informed consent, please contact the Boston Herald — see below for contact information — and demand that they issue a retraction of their support for violence against those who question the vaccine orthodoxy. ~ SVC]

===============

Dr. Lyons-Weiler Invites Boston Herald to Retract Editorial as Hate Speech
http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/05/dr-lyons-weiler-invites-boston-herald-to-retract-editorial-as-hate-speech.html
Note: Thank you to Dr. James Lyons-Weiler for calling out the Boston Herald’s despicable editorial calling for violence against those who elect for medical freedom and vaccine choice. Find his books on Amazon here.

===============

Refusal to Vaccinate Should Be a Hanging Offense?
http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2017/05/refusal-to-vaccinate-should-be-a-hanging-offense/
by Marco Cáceres

EXCERPT:

If you have ever wondered what the opposite of love is, let me tell you… it’s not hate. It’s fear.1 2 Yes, I’m aware of the slightly different and perhaps more popular take on that idea by Elie Wiesel: “The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.”3 I like both of them, but I lean toward the former. So what breeds fear?

Answer: ignorance.4

What we have in the evolving, ever more contentious debate over vaccines and vaccine policy in the United States is a lot of fear, fueled by a lot of ignorance. Ignorance about vaccine history, science and the ethics of mandatory vaccination laws. That’s bad enough. But what’s worse is the product of that ignorance-bred fear.

All too often, the by-product of fear is violence or the call to violence—which is what we’re starting to see in newspaper and magazine articles written by those who oppose and want to marginalize anyone who publicly criticizes the safety of vaccine policies or advocates for the human right to exercise informed consent to medical risk taking, which includes the right to make a voluntary decision about use of vaccines.

===============

BOSTON HERALD SETS DANGEROUS & DISGUSTING TREND OF DEHUMANIZING PARENTS
http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/boston-herald-sets-dangerous-potentionally-unlawful-trend-of-dehumanizing-parents

EXCERPT:
The piece was in response to a recent event in which Somali American families, who have the highest rate of autism in the United States, voiced their concerns about the vaccine injury they were experiencing. The Minnesota Somali community is being aggressively targeted for rounds of MMR vaccines.

—— RELATED…

BOSTON HERALD “HANGING” THREAT OPENLY VIOLATES MA 11H: HERE’S HOW TO PUSH BACK
http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/boston-herald-hanging-threat-openly-violates-ma-11a-heres-how-to-push-back
EXERPT:
Besides the thinly veiled threat from the Herald, that does have the potential to bring violence upon the Somali American community, the Herald appears to be violating section 11H of the Massachusetts Anti-bullying law.

===============

Boston Herald calls for government-run execution squads to MASS MURDER naturopaths, scientists and journalists who oppose mercury in immunizations
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-05-11-boston-herald-calls-for-government-run-execution-squads-mass-murder-scientists-journalists.html

EXCERPT:
Why I am filing a complaint with the FBI and the Boston Police

In conclusion, with its editorial calling for the killing of vaccine skeptics, the Boston Herald has just declared open warfare on people like myself who are informed, compassionate defenders of the lives of children. The Boston Herald has directly threatened rational vaccine skeptics and is now complicit in any acts of aggression or violence against any of us. Today, I am filing an official criminal complaint with the Boston FBI to urge them to investigate the Boston Herald staffers for their criminal intimidation and calls for mass murder, and I am going to inform the FBI that I consistently assert my right to invoke a firearm in my own self-defense against violent lunatics like the Boston Herald terrorists.

As part of this effort, I have already called the Boston police, and they told me where to officially file my complaint in my local jurisdiction so that they can open an investigation into the Boston Herald.

—— RELATED…

EMERGENCY Action Item: Join us in reporting Boston Herald journo-terrorists to the Boston FBI and Boston Police
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-05-11-emergency-action-item-join-us-in-reporting-boston-herald-journo-terrorists-to-the-boston-fbi-and-boston-police.html

Demand the Boston Herald retract its terrorism threat

Boston Herald Twitter handle: @BostonHerald

Boston Herald contact page link.

PHONE NUMBERS
Switchboard: 617-426-3000
Arts & Lifestyle: 617-619-6315
Business News: 617-619-6496
City Desk: 617-619-6514
Sports: 617-619-6410
School Services: 617-619-6223
Library: 617-619-6332
Retail Advertising: 617-619-6185
Photos: 617-619-6499
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
E-mail: letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com

STREET ADDRESS:
Boston Herald
70 Fargo St
Boston, MA 02210

Help Request from Parents Seeking Vaccination Exemptions in Sarasota County — or Florida Generally?

Dear Reader,

We continue to receive inquiries from local parents asking us if they should expect to encounter hurdles or difficulties in obtaining, for their school-age children, religious or medical exemptions from vaccination requirements in Sarasota County. [1] 

For example, a local mother we’ll refer to as “Sarah” (not her real name) wrote the following:

I am planning on filing the ‘DH 681’ religious exemption for my daughter… I’d like to obtain the religious exemption for her, but I don’t want to go in blind, have them start asking me all these questions, then blindside me and then they just reject it.

I can go to the Department of Health, I’m assuming up here on Ringling Boulevard [in downtown Sarasota] and get it done there? [2] 

What is the process? What should I expect when I walk in the door?

What kind of questions are they allowed to ask me? Can they ask me if she was vaccinated before? If they do, do I say yes, or do I say no?

Are they allowed to ask me what religion I am? Or why I’m just now deciding to do this when she was vaccinated before? Do I tell them that I switched religions?

I just need to go in armed with the knowledge of what to expect and how it should go.

… In summary, has anyone in our community obtained the religious exemption? If so did it work? Were you denied?Was it easy?

Any help is much appreciated please and thank you.”

Important note: Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC) has not received any specific information to suggest that local officials are making it difficult for — or “pushing back” against — parents who make the requests for exemption from vaccination.

That said, however, we would greatly appreciate any feedback from Sarasota parents, regarding your personal experiences —positive or negative — in dealing with the exemption process.

Also, any suggestions you have found helpful in navigating this process would be most appreciated.

To share your story or suggestions, please email svcsrqorg@gmail.com or post to our Facebook page, HERE.

Note: If you send your feedback via email, we promise to maintain your anonymity; needless to say, if you post via Facebook, we may have no control over whether your name appears or not.

Thank you,
Sarasota for Vaccination Choice (SVC)

DISCLAIMER: This is not, nor should it be construed as, legal or medical advice.

======

NOTES:

[1] According to Florida Statutes, two types of exemptions from vaccinations are available; religious and medical.

National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has summarized the Florida situation as follows:

Quick Facts and Resources for Florida Residents
“A request for a religious exemption from immunization requirements must be presented to the facility/school on the Department of Health’s Religious Exemption From Immunization form (DH 681 Form). The DH 681 Form is issued only by county health departments and only for a child who is not immunized because of his/her family’s religious tenets or practices. If a parent requests such an exemption, the county health department staff must use the current DH 681 Form, which has been signed by the parent affirming the written statement on the form that a religious conflict exists. This form must be issued upon request. No other information should be solicited from the parent or guardian.”  Rule 64D-3.046, Florida Administrative Code. Medical exemptions are also allowed. [EMPHASES ADDED]
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/florida.aspx

Exemption from Required Immunizations: Florida Dept. of Health
http://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/immunization/children-and-adolescents/immunization-exemptions/

[2] Florida Dept. of Health: Sarasota Locations
http://sarasota.floridahealth.gov/locations/index.html

Victims of vaccine damage can sue manufacturers in the US

[RELATED:

The CDC’s Massive VACCINE DAMAGE COVER-UP – The VSD System…
http://bolenreport.com/vaccines-ten-thousand-times-dangerous-led-believe/
Vaccines are Ten Thousand Times More Dangerous Than We Were Led To Believe…

The CDC and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Contractors are Doing Everything They Can to Hide This Scandal… ]

Original here:  https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/victims-of-vaccine-damage-can-sue-manufacturers-in-the-us/

Victims of vaccine damage can sue manufacturers in the US

It’s happening now…

by Jon Rappoport

May 7, 2017

(Note to our loyal readers: We’re working to restore NoMoreFakeNews.com. Meanwhile, this blog is fully operating. Posting continues. To join our email list, click here.)

Major media aren’t giving this story the coverage it deserves. I certainly am. 

Short question: Can a person sue a US vaccine manufacturer?

Short answer: Under certain conditions, yes.

Note: I’m not framing this article as professional legal advice. I’m reporting what I’ve been able to dig up on a very explosive issue so far. I’ve communicated with two lawyers and a law professor. I’ve been pointed to an important passage on a federal web page.

Right now, lawyers and their clients are suing Merck, the manufacturer, for injuries incurred from Merck’s shingles vaccine, Zostavax.

Among the claimed injuries: contracting shingles; blindness in one eye; partial paralysis; brain damage; death.

One of the plaintiffs’ attorneys told me he has already filed two cases in California. Each case has 50 plaintiffs. He states he has 5000 clients waiting in the wings. There are other attorneys with other plaintiffs.

But wait. Isn’t there a federal law that bars people from suing vaccine manufacturers?

Isn’t that law the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act? Doesn’t it demand that people go to a special federal “vaccine tribunal/court” and plead for compensation from the government?

Aren’t vaccine manufacturers shielded from liability for causing injury?

Well, it turns out there are exceptions to the rule.

Adult vaccines are not part of the 1986 federal law.

The law shielding vaccine companies only applies to childhood vaccines.

The Merck shingles vaccine is only for adults.

The special federal “vaccine tribunal/court” is established as part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This is where parents who claim their children were injured by vaccines must go, to ask for compensation from the government—not from vaccine manufacturers.

But on a web page of the US Dept. of Health and Human Services, under “Health Resources and Services Administration,” we see “Frequently Asked Questions.” And we read this rather opaque statement:

“In order for a category of vaccines to be covered, the category of vaccines must be recommended for routine administration to children by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention…” [Note: On this clumsy FAQ web page, you have to click on “View Answer” under the following question to see it: “If a new vaccine product is licensed, what needs to occur before the vaccine will be covered by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)?”]

What does “covered” mean? It means “covered exclusively by the federal compensation program.” It means a parent who believes her child has been injured by a vaccine goes to the special federal “court.” The vaccine must be FOR CHILDREN. However, an adult seeking compensation for vaccine injury, FROM AN ADULT VACCCINE, would, with a lawyer, argue his case in ordinary state or federal court. That adult would sue the vaccine manufacturer.

This message from the federal government is clear. The ban against suing vaccine manufacturers only applies to vaccines recommended for children (and pregnant women). The ban does not apply to adult vaccines.

CONTINUES HERE: https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/victims-of-vaccine-damage-can-sue-manufacturers-in-the-us/