BREAKING: Major Health Freedom Victory! 4 Vaccine Bills Defeated in Florida

Excerpt:

“After a deluge of vaccine bills threatening to strip health freedom flooded the FL legislature earlier this year, the concerted efforts of grassroots activists and independent media emerged victorious with all 4 bills now officially withdrawn and defeated.”

Read the article, here: 

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-major-health-freedom-victory-4-vaccine-bills-defeated-fl

 

 

Advertisements

Is Bill Gates History’s Deadliest Do-Gooder?

Original here: 

Ghost in the Machine, Part 5 — Lies, Denial, Deceit and Manipulative ‘Research’

By Dr. Mercola

In the last decade, vaccines have become Big Pharma’s biggest profit center. A report published by MarketsandMarkets estimates the global vaccine market, currently valued at $34.30 billion a year, will grow to an astounding $49.27 billion by 2022.1

Why the boom? As blockbuster drugs like Lipitor, Viagra, Seroquel, Zyprexa, Singular and Concerta have gone off patent, vaccines prove a lucrative replacement. Not only are they priced much higher than pills, governments and NGOs shamelessly help market vaccines to huge swaths of the world’s population.

These unethical partnerships, using taxpayer or NGO money, advance misleading research intended to frighten the public. Worse, they discredit vaccine critics who raise legitimate safety and efficacy questions and even discredit the families and victims of vaccine injuries themselves. To cash in on vaccine profits Big Pharma, governments and NGOs have characterized all vaccines as “life-saving.” One of the clearest examples is the attempt to present vaccines against the HPV virus as vaccines “against cancer.”

“Science” articles warn that as many as 90 percent of adults, especially baby boomers, silently harbor the HPV virus much like articles that warn many baby boomers are infected with the Hepatitis C virus.

In both cases, the drug industry is trying to “grow” the market for its products by inflating the amount of estimated sufferers. Reporters either wittingly or unwittingly help in the effort by repeating the drug industry supplied “facts.” The truth is more than 90 percent of HPV infections are cleared by the body2 without symptoms and only 20 percent of HPV infections are the high-risk type that could develop into cancer if not identified and treated.3

Big Pharma’s misleading advertising is not working, though. Many families of adolescent boys and girls targeted by HPV vaccine marketing by drug companies and government health officials are refusing the vaccine.4

Reacting to the HPV vaccine dropouts, Big Pharma launched an offensive “shame” campaign last year in which young adults with cancer blame their parents for not vaccinating them when they were adolescents. The ads were so over-the-top even supporters of the vaccine complained. Twitter remarks accused the company of trying to guilt-trip parents to bolster corporate profits.5

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Promotes Vaccines and Their Profits

One of the world’s leading funders of vaccine development and promotion is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (B&MGF).6 In 2002, it began buying billions in drug stocks7 and subsequently added huge amounts of Monsanto stock.8 Two of the B&MGF’s research heads were hired right out of Pharma — one from GlaxoSmithKline, with whom the B&MGF had a long-standing collaboration, and the other from Novartis.9

Even more shocking, it hired the former president of product development at Genentech to serve as its current CEO, Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann.10 This is how health writer Ruben Rosenberg Colorni describes the true nature of the foundation:11

“The Bill & Melinda Gates ‘Foundation’ is essentially a huge tax-avoidance scheme for enormously-wealthy capitalists who have made billions from exploiting the world’s people. The foundation invests, tax free, money from Gates and the ‘donations’ from others, in the very companies in which Gates owns millions in stocks, thus guaranteeing returns through both sales as well as intellectual-property rights.

To add insult to injury, the system perpetuates the spread of disease rather than aids in their eradication, thus perpetually justifying his endeavors to ‘eradicate’ them (solving a problem they are creating).”

In a 2011 Forbes interview, Bill Gates admitted the new profitability of vaccines.12 “Ten or 15 years ago, nobody in the drug business would have held up vaccines as profit centers,” he said, conceding that “vaccines are so tough, particularly because of liability issues.” But now, “people are making money in the vaccine business,” he noted.

Questions About Overseas Vaccination Programs

Questions about the ethics of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s overseas vaccination programs have swirled for years, specifically a study aimed at validating a low-cost way to screen for cervical cancer in India.13 This summer, STAT News reported that “new evidence of ethical lapses” has been published.14

CONTINUES HERE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/31/vaccines-manipulative-research.aspx

MERCK’S HPV VACCINE RESEARCH SCANDAL GAINS MAINSTREAM ATTENTION

Original here: http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/mercks-hpv-vaccine-research-scandal-gains-mainstream-attention

By Jefferey Jaxen

It has been well over a decade since Merck’s human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil was approved for use. During that time, layer upon layer of research fraud, statistical manipulation, and the purposeful omission of inconvenient facts has created one of medicine’s biggest scandals.

In 2017, historically pro-Big Pharma and pro-vaccine outlet Slate.com launched an eight-month investigation, presumable to debunk the ‘anti-vaccine’ debate once and for all, into the science behind Merck’s HPV vaccine Gardasil. What Slate found wasn’t an open and shut case. Since its inception, the research leading to Gardasil’s regulatory approval has been hotly contested. And now the findings from Slate’s investigation have joined in public lockstep, with the same concerns ‘anti-vaxxers’ have voiced for years, to criticize the lack of science underpinning the HPV vaccine.

Slate’s article reports:

An eight-month investigation by Slate found the major Gardasil trials were flawed from the outset, however, and that regulators allowed unreliable methods to be used to test the vaccine’s safety.

It is important to note here that, as Slate rightly explained in their article, drug regulators look much more seriously at potential side effects that surface during pre-licensure studies rather than after a product has been put on the market. So how were Merck’s pre-licensure Gardasil trials flawed?

Slate obtained more than 2,300 pages of documents through Freedom-of-Information requests from hospitals and health authorities. The documents and information led Slate to suggest there were “…inadequacies built into Merck’s major clinical tests of Gardasil.”  Slate’s investigation stated:

To track the safety of its product, the drugmaker used a convoluted method that made objective evaluation and reporting of potential side effects impossible during all but a few weeks of its years-long trials. At all other times, individual trial investigators used their personal judgment to decide whether or not to report any medical problem as an adverse event—essentially, as a potential side effect worth evaluating further.

Rather than tracking all side effects (adverse reactions) the same, investigators were free to cherry-pick reactions they felt were important essentially handicapping the integrity and quality of the Gardasil trials.

After the disingenuous Gardasil trials that led to its regulatory licensing, the global public at large became the final phase of testing. In the real world, where adverse reactions and inconvenient findings can’t be discarded by Merck researchers, the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is the only effort in place to chronicle issues with the HPV vaccine. VAERS has logged 54,105 adverse reactions related to the HPV vaccine. Among those, 2,227 are listed as “disabled,” 10,416 are listed as “did not recover,” 7,418 are listed as “serious,” and 362 deaths have been reported. Many other reports were listed on VAERS including emergency room visits after vaccination [14,928], hospitalized [5,155], and life-threatening [868].

A US Health and Human Services-funded study by Harvard Medical School tracked reporting to VAERS over a three-year period at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care involving 715,000 patients and found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” A US House Report similarly stated: “Former FDA Commissioner David A. Kessler has estimated that VAERS reports currently represent only a fraction of the serious adverse events.” Recalculating the VAERS HPV reports using Harvard Medical School’s findings of only one percent reporting, the current VAERS information from the HPV vaccine reporting could in reality be as high as 5,410,500 adverse reactions, 1,041,600 disabled, and 36,200 deaths.

VigiAccess is an interface that houses data on medicines and vaccine side effects (adverse reactions) reported to the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring (WHO PIDM). The system shows 192,039 reported adverse reactions globally for the three HPV vaccines combined.

Since regulators look much more seriously at potential side effects that surface during pre-licensure studies, official efforts to investigate the scale of injuries from the HPV vaccine has been little to none. We have witnessed a global generation left debilitated by health problems from the HPV vaccine that regulators, global health authorities, and the establishment medical community at large have flatly ignored.

Investigations from around the world in Ireland, Colombia, Japan, Denmark, American, Africa and others have shown near exact patterns of severe adverse reactions from the HPV vaccine programs once they are initiated, and in some cases forced, by government health agencies. Japan’s health agency officially retracted its HPV recommendation only months after mounting injury caused massive pushback from the public.

700 girls in Colombia are currently in the middle of a major class action lawsuit against Merck Sharp & Dohme for damages caused by the Gardasil vaccine.

CONTINUES HERE: http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/mercks-hpv-vaccine-research-scandal-gains-mainstream-attention

We All Want Healthy Children — Hepatitis B Vaccination Education Fund

Original here: http://companyethics.com
NOTE: For more information and for links to the HepB vaccine package inserts, see: http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/hepatitis-b/overview.aspx
A simple, easy script to introduce discussion of the HepB [Hepatitis B] vaccine for newborns.

We all want healthy children

During a regular conversation with anyone, to perk their interest, the scenario goes something like:

You: May I ask you a question?

Other: (they say yes or facially signal ok)

You: Do you know what vaccine is given to a baby on the day it is born?

Other: (many seem surprised that this is done)

You: It’s ok if you don’t know, I had to learn too. (Let them struggle a bit and then say, I’ll tell you).

You: It’s the HepB

Other: (moves their head, like oh
, like ok, or I should have known that)

You: Do you know how HepB is transmitted?

Other: (many will start thinking as if they should know this)

You: (let them struggle a few seconds) It’s ok, I had to learn as well. I’ll tell you.

You: HepB is transmitted by dirty needles or sexual intimacy / coitus)

Other: (they might nod or say something, again as feeling like they should have known or remembered)

You: So why on the day a baby is born does it need this vaccination?

No vaccine is 100% safe, why take any risk of vaccine injury?
At this point the conversation may flow in any numer of ways but salient points to bring up are:
  1. The Vaccine’s aluminum content exceeds CDCs own recommendation.
  2. … and into a very immature immune system with a not-as-yet-fully-developed kidneys that can help eliminate aluminum.
  3. What’s the harm in waiting several months or even years?

At some point acknowledge that this might be hard to grasp as to why the CDC recommends this schedule. But the best answers I have gotten as to how we got to this point is that not all mothers are tested for HepB and to “protect” babies they all were given the vaccine.  No baby should be given this vaccine on the day of birth unless the mother tests positive for HepB.

We all need to work toward making this message go “viral!”
Please email  with attachment to friends.  Hepb talking point sheet (pdf) and spread the message on social networks.

HepB.info/fb | HepB.info/linkedIn | HepB.info/Pinterest | HepB.info/twitter